
Originally Posted by
Jack Springer

Originally Posted by
opinterph
What is the basis of that controversy? Why is it of interest for discussion?
An example ... one of the ads promotes promiscuous sex by saying now you have Obamacare and free birth control so you can have all the sex you want with whoever you want. Nothing in the ad promotes safe sex -- just birth control.
Susie and Nate are 'Hot to Trot'
That ad appears in the opening post of this thread.
Do you think it really promotes promiscuous sex or does it maybe remind young residents that the availability of birth control through Obamacare helps prevent unintended pregnancies?
Do you think the asterisk corresponding to a statement at the bottom of the ad fails to properly emphasize that “the pill” is not a substitute for condoms and common sense?

Originally Posted by
Jack Springer
Colorado has spent over $25 million to '********' only 6,000 ACA customers.
(From the linked article)
Colorado has an estimated 350,000 people who are uninsured.
$25,000,000 ÷ 350,000 = $71
What portion of the $25 million Colorado has spent promoting Obamacare went to fund the ads featured in the initial posts of this thread and that reportedly “have been stirring up controversy in the right wing blogs?”