The Official DAVID BECKHAM thread!!! [merged]

[deanwig69]

i love him

[TriBi]

I seriously belong in the "who gives a shit" category...

[sc2004]

i love him, my first, actually second crush, i was like 10 when he got engaged to posh spice, remember being jelous. lol.

[Lancsdan]

in that pic, id far rather have Ryan Giggs. So cute!

[harristate]

I prefer the guy in front of him. Look at that hairy chest and great smile. yes.

[moonrabbit]

He has always bored me for some reason.

[lewmagnet]

Fucking hell, they're hot and look real haha

[albar05]

awesome pics man, however i think you will see that picture 1 and the last one on the post above are fake...

The first pic is the David Beckham look-alike and the last one on the weights bench is a fake... but very hot pics anyway!!

Pity he looks so much better when he is being silent! don;t like his voice at all ... :O)

[jimrent66]

The pic of him lifting weights is real. I saw it, I think it was either in a late issue of details or GQ.

[quasar]

In the first set of pics, the last 2 are fake, in the second set the 1st one is fake - he doesn't have that tattoo on his arse... Still gorgeous though!!!

[JVal]

This was posted on perezhilton.com




Looks pretty real to me...

I think this picture belongs to the Vanity Fair shoot.



Another statement:

This pic is one of a set, parts of which have been used in various mags in the uk ( although not full length)
The set caused huge controversy at the time as his apparent depiction of the crucifixion and " The Son Of God" was deemed `arrogant and distasteful `
There after the pics seemed to disappear to a dusty draw, till now.
As a professional designer, I would just mention a few points. If this were a fake, (and I believe it not ) there would be a number of clear `giveaways`
none on which are present. The comment about the hallo effect around his head is simple `backlighting` used to highlight the head and separate it from the background. (usually practice on this kind of low light ,moody shoot)
The shadows on the face and body match perfectly in both strength and direction. (very difficult to do even with Photoshop or even paintbox)
The discolouration on the legs is just a lighting effect used to center your eye on the subject , like a vignette).
Incidentally, with regard to the `cut uncut issue. In a uk newspaper article after Mr Beckham alleged adulterous affair. His secretary stated that Becks was "big and uncut".

Any opinions?

[nickmybabe]

for me , its Kinda fake somehow ...

[tila123]

hmmmmmmmmmm hard to tell.....

[CaptainCaveman]

Does anyone actually believe that David Beckham would pose nude - come on guys think about it.

Something like this would have been all over the tabloids at the time if it were true, so don't even bother trying to work out if it's real or fake.

[EricCage]

I like the crucifix pose. It's hot!

[youdontknow]

Does anyone actually believe that David Beckham would pose nude - come on guys think about it.

Something like this would have been all over the tabloids at the time if it were true, so don't even bother trying to work out if it's real or fake.

thank you. at least someone is talking sense.

he may not be as famous in America, but over here in europe i think its safe to say we all know he wouldn't pose nude. not full frontally anyway

but we can always dream!

[Royal Heart]

And he really does have muscular legs like that, complete with that degree of definition. I think it's likely that it's the real thing.

[xterranx]

Wow, if it's a fake...it's a REALLY good one.

[gordor5]

I think its a fake too, I mean he may be hot but isnt he just a Soccer player? Not trying to sound rude but i dont think hes "Important" enough to do stuff like that

[REESEYBOI]

I think its a fake too, I mean he may be hot but isnt he just a Soccer player? Not trying to sound rude but i dont think hes "Important" enough to do stuff like that

omg have u been living under a rock; i am an american, not into sports, and even i know that beckham is HUGE he and posh are like royalty; they are one of the most famous and most often photgraphed (i.e. stalked) couples on the globe. Think brangelina for like the last 7 years now non-stop. huge huge huge!!!!!!!!

[marstons123]

I used photoshop and took out the "jum!" if anyone wants to use the image as something else but it has smudged a little in the abdomen so dont think of it as a point to make when figuring it out if its real or fake

[Ryan444]

Probably not real but looks real and I hope it is.

[whatsup72]

I dont think its real, that other picture of his dick, he looks average. Unless hes half hard, which I have a feeling he is the way its rising up.

[LukitaS]

Totally Fake!! You think someone so famous and a father..would do those kinda photos?? Will skinny pathetic Victoria allow David to do such thing? The answer is just one word "NO"..so end the discussion it is a very perfect fake but not David´s dick.

[CaptainCaveman]

^ More celebs take photos nude than you probably know.

But NOT him.

[sexualrevolution]

Check this out:
http://fleshbot.com/sex/gay/david-be...ude-252789.php

[KevinRG]

Those feet and ankles looks so big. It's not proportionate to his body.

[SashaLex]

I thought so too. And they look darker than his body. In fact, they look like they belong to someone else totally. But if it's a fake, I agree, it's a good one.

[quasar]

Fake. The tattoos are wrong, and his feet/toes are too big.

[tomersh]

Fake. The tattoos are wrong, and his feet/toes are too big.

sorry to disappoint but it is fake....look at these two pics ...the tattoos have moved...the one on the right arm and the one on the shoulder should be closer much much closer and on the left hand even though the "sentence" above that tattoo shouldn't entirely appear but at least part of it should.... that's wt i think...but if turn out to be true....fuck me....he moved up on my list.....way up...

[Danugh]

Fake. The tattoos are wrong

Actually the tattoos in the pictures you posted are in the correct place.

The only thing is that his feet are just wrong, but the body is dead on.

The feet look nasty though.

[jackkisser]

looks very real

[SamuelTen]

Someone seems to have pasted his head on someone else's body and photshopped the tattoos on his body. The one on his right shoulder is too high up. You can see it from this pic:

[bostonboy20]

ok and also...for a guy who is like the "first metrosexual"....do you really think he wouldn't do a little manscaping down there for a full frontal nude shot?

[ilijah]

his feet remind me of something...give me a minute...it will come to me....

[ilijah]

LOL---shit...this is amazing...folks are more than likely bang on and it's not him, but gay men have some sharp eyes. I didn't even notice that tats until someone pointed them out and his FEET didn't appear huge until I really looked at them...his feet are kind of like Fred Flintstone's.

[quasar]

Actually the tattoos in the pictures you posted are in the correct place...

Almost the correct place. The attachment show the mistakes, and on the left arm, there should also be some script work above the main tattoo.

There are times when I look at it though and think its actually a painting rather than a photo.....

[schatzeboppes]

Obviously there arent many (good) photoshop artists on this forum. I can spot that as a fake a mile away.
It has 'FAKE' written all over it.

[hayden777]

It IS REAL!! These were outtakes from another photo shoot. And sometimes celebs do pose in "arty" nude shots. There are photographers such as Greg Gorman and Herb Ritts who have photographed some of the most famous actors and celebs nude. Greg Gorman published a book called "As I See It" which featured some very famous celebs in the buff!! As for the tattoos, his arms are in very different positions in each photograph. so you can't go by that. In one his arms are stretched out and in the other they are down by his side, relaxed.. When you stretch out your arm, the skin stretches so that would affect the distance of the tats.

[babydollmissg]

real or not, i don't care.. all i know is that it's H-O-T!!!

[Keebee]

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ......

[SamuelTen]

It is a hot picture, no denying that. it isn't real though, unfortunately. Just very well done

[johnno25]

I don't believe it's real either. Having said that, part of me thinks that if it isn't, then surely Mr. Beckham would be dragging somebody through a court. So...maybe it is.
Whatever, it's a nice pic and certainly provides a tool to aid fantasy! I Like!

[ukguy_82]

I want it to be real...but I also very much don't want it to be. There is something more sexy and apealing not ever seeing everything, for me anyway. It would be a shame after years of hoping finally being given a pic like this and it being real. Kinda takes something away. saying that if it is real then I'm still finding him as hot as ever!

[sangoma]

thank you. at least someone is talking sense.

he may not be as famous in America, but over here in europe i think its safe to say we all know he wouldn't pose nude. not full frontally anyway

but we can always dream!

You nailed it perfectly

[tomersh]

It IS REAL!! These were outtakes from another photo shoot. And sometimes celebs do pose in "arty" nude shots. There are photographers such as Greg Gorman and Herb Ritts who have photographed some of the most famous actors and celebs nude. Greg Gorman published a book called "As I See It" which featured some very famous celebs in the buff!! As for the tattoos, his arms are in very different positions in each photograph. so you can't go by that. In one his arms are stretched out and in the other they are down by his side, relaxed.. When you stretch out your arm, the skin stretches so that would affect the distance of the tats.

come on....how much can the skin stretch?...i don't know if it's real or not i'm just sure 100% that there is something extremly wierd about the tattoos..and i don't know, evreybody is saying his feet look too weird , his feet don't seem that wierd to me...maybe it's just the pose he's doing....they might be a bit big..but that might explain the big dick

[boxerbriefs]

There's some really stupid people in this topic.

[tomersh]

There's some really stupid people in this topic.

EXCUSE ME?.......Y DON'T U CLEARIFY UR COMMENT IF U WELL

[JesseNYC]

The shadow behind his head doesnt fit.

The baby angle's leg comes to a point.

The tattoo on his right shoulder is too high.

[wanderer]

iv done lots of graphic work, and i know a "real" artists would have had an artist's eye to do a better job on that photo. the tats are different, and the main thing about them is that they are too black, and to contrasted with the rest of the arms. there shouldnt be so sharp either, and more rounded with the contour of the arm.

i didnt really focus on the feet too much, because lets just not forget this guy plays soccer for a living. so i can imagine there would be stress to the feet. the head is a little too small.

and i think he would have groomed down there also

i think we should have a contest for the best fake david beckham nude photo......in another thread or something.