Thank your for posting your gallery to share it with all of us.
A Personal Rant/Commentary
My comments that follow are in no way directed at your gallery but rather more as generalized comments applicable to who ever may wish to read them. And if any offense is and or has been taken by what I have written I do truly apologize as that is not my intent in any way. (see comment below about removal of this posting)
These daddies - do they ever think of smiling. Is there some code of conduct amongst them or in the by laws of homosexual daddies, that one should not smile if at all possible as it might be detrimental to said daddy image? I mean they almost all look so unfriendly and cold and well to but it mildly, so egocentric. Narcism seems to be exuding everywhere with a few exceptions.
Do you know what, Dolly the sheep who was cloned? She had nothing to worry about. These guys have her beat by a lump of wool There seems to be running around in the "daddy world" about 6-8 specific clones that all of these guys ( or at least a good portion of them ) see to have come from. I mean you talk about stereotyping amoung male homosexuals - this is like almost the ultimate. I can thing of another group who is almost or just as bad but then often come with cigars, or were special clothing which must he hotter then hell when things really get hot. (bad pun, I know it.)
And finally but not lastly are their cocks. I mean have you ever seen such a borning assortment of cocks. They look like they all came from the same 4-8 molds. What is there, a shortage on small to average size cocks with real hair and not these elongated, quasi shaved tinker toys. Give us a break. Are we that stupid or not that intelligent that we have to be spoon fed "our daddies" in the homosexual culture. What happened to the words diversity? or Imaginative? or different, or unique? Have these words been eliminated from the "daddie part of the homosexual culture?"
Someone I met on this website and who has become a fine friend he went an posted some drawings of homosexuals - I replied they all looked the same including their cocks - his reply, well maybe the artist used the same model with the same cock for all of them. Good point, I had to admit. Then he posted some more postings about homosexuals different artists - same problems - same cocks and same looking people. My response BORING. Then he went and posted some photographs by Robert Mapplethorpe whose latter period I may not have cared for but damn it they were great art and not clones every where. Sure Mapplethorpe photographed his share of clones including himself BUT THEY WERE CREATIVE. Which is something daddie photographers seem to have forgotten CREATIVITY BEGETS CREATIVITY AND DIVERSITY AND IMAGINATION AND IS SURE AS HELL IS NO BORING - IF DONE PROPERLY.
If the fuckig homosexuals want to know where the source of some of there stereotyping is coming from - then let them look to their own house(s). It is right there in front of them - and the times have not changed - years may have passed - but stagnation has not.
Those of you who wish to chastise me may do so - the line forms to the right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>please no whips, etc, I bruise easily, I don't handle pain very well and for all practical purposes the Cowardly Lion from the Wizard of Oz and I are closely related by a generation..
It has been a lousy day for the local village idiot, so if anyone is truly offended by what I have written, please request to have this posting removed. You Have my permission.
Very nice gallery!
Your galleries are hot - especially the daddies - got my vote. I have a thing for Kenny Chesney, too.
Wonderful galleries...great taste in men...I've had a hard-on for Kenny Chesney for years....keep up the good work...I'll visit your galleries often!
I'm in love about 40 times over! Very nice.
Croynan, about your rant: I don't really understand what has you so upset. Using mshplover's gallery for examples, since that seems to have triggered you, I notice, looking through it's varied and often lovely images, any number of smiling friendly-looking daddies. (Although some of these men are awfully young to be called daddies. Collin O' Neal? He's magnificent, and he has a sexy grin, but is he even 30 yet?) I find the relentless image of the stern daddy, one who is quick to punish, dull also. In a social situation the daddy I'll come on to is the one who flashes me a smile. And the cigar fetish. Yes, ugh! Nothing attractive about having what always looks like a turd stuck in your mouth. and the clouds of foul-smelling smoke just makes them look like they stink. So skip those ones, and enjoy the smiling ones. Why gripe? As for "Have you ever seen such a boring assortment of cocks?" I have never seen a "Boring assortment of cocks" in my life. Cock assortments, like assorments of chocolates, always have some tasty ones, even if there are too many soft centers. I don't see a clone cock. Are you telling me, again drawing from this gallery, that Ben Archer, Arpad Miklos, Donnie Russo, Collin O'Neal and Steve Hurley all have identical dicks? Because I think I could identify each of these men by their dicks alone. There's tremendous variation in length, girth, shape, foreskins and their absence, coloring and knob sculpture. It's true that there are few small-to-average sized dicks in gay porn, although it never occurred to me that that was a problem. I know small dicks have their admirerers. How can they complain? They have so little competition for their small delights. As for artist's work, naturally an artist will photograph or draw the type that turns them on, so any one artist's work will have a certain similarity, from Tom of Finland's near-dentical clones to The Hun's furry, mean bears.
I'm not lashing your rant. I just don't get it. Keep looking. There's all types out there on the net.
Sometimes there is nothing hotter for a daddy than another hot daddy...or sometimes two hot daddies and their bois...
Anyhoo....your galleries are great...keep the pics comin'...they keep me cummin'!
Um, small-to-average sized dicks make up half of the population. How can you say there's no competition?Originally Posted by Sir Les
Of course, it's a problem that there are few small-to-average sized dicks in porn -- it sends out the incorrect message that big dicks are intrinsic to desirability. I mean, I've got nothing against guys who like larger cocks, but if I can sit through an orgy scene with a few guys that I find unattractive for whatever reason, so can they.
However, I wouldn't pin this on the "daddy world," Croynan, I think it's pretty much the case across the board in porn.
Demons to some. Angels to others.
Oh, and almost forgot, great gallery, mshplover! I like the Aaron Tippin pictures too. Gotta be a shirtless one of him somewhere...
Demons to some. Angels to others.
Porn isn't about sending out messages. Who bases what they're attracted to on what they see in porn? It's the other way around. The porn you seek out is the porn that presents what you like, and what you like is in-born, not learned. If we liked what we are taught to like, we'd all be straight, now wouldn't we? Good God, isn't porn one place we can be safe from political correctness? If liking big dicks is politically incorrect, then I shall be incorrect to my grave. If small-to-average size dicks make up half, if not more, of the population (Just what "Average" means.) then I'm right, there's a glut, and therefore less compettition for them. If you like small dicks, as you clearly do, then there's LOTS of them out there only too glad to know you. Meanwhile the fewer-but-more-widely-desired large dicks are more competed for. And, sure we all have seen orgy scenes with one or more guys we found less attractive than the others. We've even BEEN in orgies where not everyone really rings our bells. Unfortunately, while an average size dick can still be great fun in bed, I've found that, for me, a small dick just doesn't cut it. If I can't feel it, what's the point? If it can't reach my prostate, it's of no use to me. And in porn, what I enjoy looking at are obviously the best-looking dicks, which to me, is big ones. For Rockercub, it's small ones. Fine. We'll never have to fight over one dick we both want, will we? And yes Bear33334, sometimes, even, in my case, more often than not, there's nothing hotter for a daddy than another daddy. Or two or three. With smiles. And big dicks.
It isnít about sending out messages, but it does send out messages. Just like fashion magazines with primarily anorexic models send out messages to young girls that thin is the only attractive state when it isnít, porn with primarily large dicks tells guys that big is the only attractive state when it isnít.Originally Posted by Sir Les
Itís also not about political correctness. Look, if I was in the minority, Iíd totally agree with you. I mean, a small minority of guys are into scat, and I donít want to see that thrown into the mix in every porno. But everything Iím hearing when I talk to friends or check out the polls here on JUB is that most people donít care about dick size (as long as it's not extremely smallÖor large, for that matter). So, basically, the guys in gay porn do not reflect the gamut of guys that are found attractive by the majority of gay men. Apparently, though, the makers of porn figure that big dicks are a safe bet, just like the ultra-thin models are a safe bet on the runway. And the outcome is psychologically damaging to those who donít live up to that standard.Originally Posted by Sir Les
Originally Posted by Sir Les
Wait, if half of the dicks are smaller to average, then the other half are average to large. There are approximately an equal number of smaller dicks and larger dicks, so your characterization of ďfewerĒ larger dicks is wrong. What youíre talking about is desirability, not numbers, and I donít know that you can make such a claim with accuracy. People who love large dicks have no problem being vocal about it, while people who love small dicks are thought of as strange and off the beaten path. This is part of the psychological damage Iím talking about. So the guys who actually prefer small dicks arenít ever going to say anything for fear of being made fun of. How then can you claim to know whether big dicks are more desired, and therefore competed for, than small dicks? Youíre only hearing half of the story.
Originally Posted by Sir LesOriginally Posted by Sir Les
Well, Iím only five inches, and Iíve reached the prostate of every guy Iíve been with. The prostate isnít buried deep within the rectum Ė you can reach it with your finger (thus, the digital rectal exams you get from your doctor). But if you personally need or prefer a big dick, I say go for it. All Iím saying is that weíd all be better off if porn better reflected what was truly desired in our community.
Originally Posted by Sir Les
Only you get what you want, and I donít. So itís pretty easy for you to claim the status quo is A-okay, isnít it? Itís like a white person saying, ďWell, I donít experience any racism in our society, so I donít see what all the trouble is about.Ē
Demons to some. Angels to others.
You got my vote, man
Originally Posted by Rockercub
Well I do believe, a posting has been made that has more "Common Sense" in it then does my own posting which started the whole thing off to begin with.
This posting says it all and in very fine terms. Very clear, well thought out arguments, all of them reasonable and logical, it is hard to believe that anything regard the fucking question of dick size has been overlooked.
Certainly the point about small sized dicked people wanting to see more of their own is a reasonable request. I mean let's face it these king sized "weiners" have had the market place in porn for at least 40 years - it is about time something new and refreshing came along to interest people. Porn does what it wants - not what the majority of porn viewers, homosexual porn or not, are really interested in seeing.
And by the way, with the exception of maybe knowing who the "stars" are in said given homosexual porn, how in the hell can you tell the dick size of the cocks you are going to see in any said porn
film in advance? I mean have you ever seen a video listed with credits = so and so with "size cock/dick/prick "appearing as xxxxxx character? The odds of one finding an average sized cock/dick/prick in a porn film are probably as close to porn jacket really telling you what the porn is about that you are going to view. The covers on the jackets tell one story and the porn film tells another - but either way - they all "meat?" at the same place = one king sized dicked/cock/prick dome where the "stars" are picked out/up for the prick(s)/cock/dick between their legs and not the prick(s)/dick/cock between their ears.
This posting deserves a rating of 5 out of 5. Tis as close to a masterpiece about average sized dicks/cocks/pricks/ in porn as one is going to find anywhere. If there were Pulitzer Prizes for Porn writing this posting would surely deserve one.
All Hail the Writer.
A suggestion - every porn lover or seeker of porn should go to their local porn store, retail dealer and or mail order house and demand that all porn is said locations not be shelved or sorted by company name, or type of film = new, before/after bareback/ military/twinks - there is another subject right there that needs to be examined) large sized men/fetish/bear and or daddy films/etc. but should be shelved and or listed by cock/dick/prick sizes of said porn stars. That way you would really know what you are getting. And if you don't get what you want, you can then shout out the window:
"I am mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!"
(COURTESY OF THE THE FILM NETWORK)
I agree. WOOOF
super galeries. can keep you "up" for hours...
with all do respect Sir les, every time you give you're opinion you leave a feeling of rudeness and "jerkness"