look fine to me- especially the last guy!!!!!
Not quite a belly. Perhaps "soft"?
Come check out The Older Barefoot Gents Blog
I would call it normal. Not buff. I actually prefer normal.
Not husky at least :P
I don't know that I would call these guys out of shape. Perhaps not toned, but I think you could still be fit and healthy and look like any of those guys.
you might have body issues OP, none of these men are "husky", in fact they're quite defined and fit.
The last guy is gorgeous
St. John's, Newfoundland
At the worst, "average", but "normal" is more appropriate. Many in the online gay hookup community have "body issues" and unrealistic expectations. Its a wonder anyone ever gets laid. LOL
The last guy can fuck me.
That is called "a little out of shape"?
looks in-shape to me!
This is not, to my eyes, anything near what I would call "husky." We seem to have body dysmorphia to the point where a normal body that is not overly 'cut' as we would say 40 years ago, now appears 'husky.'
'Husky' used to mean, some additional 'meat on the bones.' Someone 20 pounds over normal would be in 'husky' territory, but not at the point of being called 'fat.' 40 pounds would quality as 'fat' unless someone played football and then, it seemed normal.
And these guys, to my eyes, are 'normal', i.e., indicative of how the average guy in say, his 20s or 30s, would look. Well, before we turned into the 'ab 6-pack' culture we've become. Not a bad thing, but we seem to have forgotten what 'normal' looks like.
These guys would be considered 'husky.'
Last edited by mcbrion; July 31st, 2014 at 04:27 PM. Reason: additional photos
I love husky daddies. The pics in the original post are nowhere near husky or out of shape. Your views are very skewed