I haven't seen it yet, and I'm in no rush to do so, but nevertheless but I was quite surprised they voted it at the very bottom of the list. Not that I'll be disagreeing with them.
Star Trek Into Darkness named 'worst Star Trek film'
JJ Abrams sequel was met with boos at Las Vegas Star Trek conventionHere's how their vote went from worst to best....The decision was handed down at the 'Star Trek 2013' convention, which took place in Las Vegas, with attendees being asked to rank the movies in order.
'Star Trek Into Darkness' was deemed the worst of the 12 films that have been made in the franchise, and was even booed at its mere mention.
Though it was roundly enjoyed by the general public – it's made over $450 million (£291 million) around the world – the hardcore fans took issue with the movie.
Hmmmm....13. 'Star Trek Into Darkness'
12. 'Star Trek V: The Final Frontier'
11. 'Star Trek Insurrection'
10. 'Star Trek Nemesis'
9. 'Star Trek: The Motion Picture'
8. 'Star Trek Generations'
7. 'Galaxy Quest'
6. 'Star Trek'
5. 'Star Trek: The Search For Spock'
4. 'Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home'
3. 'Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country'
2. 'Star Trek: First Contact'
1. 'Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan'
Films I think are constantly OVER-rated in these lists....
First Contact, The Voyage Home (they'd go further down in my personal list)
Films I think are constantly UNDER-rated in these lists....
The Search For Spock, Generations, Nemesis (they'd go further up in my personal list)
And needless to say both the rebooted films are going straight to the bottom.
I'm not a fan of them at all.
Bring back a new syndicated series set in the 24th century timeline!
....set 10 years after Voyager's return / the Nemesis movie....
(i.e. the same amount of time that has passed in 'real life' from those points)
That's what I'd really like.