RIP Hugo Chavez

[xbuzzerx]

Here we go again. You CANNOT buy booze with food stamps. I'll need to see a link about the millions of illegals that get food stamps.

You are correct. YOu can't buy booze with food stamps and you can't GET food stamps if you're an illegal immigrant. I don't even know if you can get them if you have a green card, maybe someone else would know. But I'm sure being on government aid would be a great way to lose your green card.

[Jack Springer]

So much hate emanating from Pastor Springer. So much anger and frustration.

Rings of hypocrisy Bob.

Typical liberal answer. Evil big oil is ok and welcome if the politics are liberal and oppressive to basic human rights.

[GiancarloC]

Typical liberal answer. Evil big oil is ok and welcome if the politics are liberal and oppressive to basic human rights.

Oh puh-lease. I guess it's okay if republicans and right wingers steal... it's the "patriotic" thing to do. It's called "creating wealth" *cough* *cough* hoarding wealth *Cough*.

[CowboyBob]

Rings of hypocrisy Bob.

Typical liberal answer. Evil big oil is ok and welcome if the politics are liberal and oppressive to basic human rights.

Mountains of hypocrisy from Father Springer.

Typical right wing non-answer.

Doesn't seem to bother you when right wing republicans slash funding for the poor, make women's wombs property of the State, try to legislate morality and are oppressive to basic human rights for gays.

[Jack Springer]

^^

... and yet you can't say that Chavez' company Citco is evil big oil because you agree with his political views.

[xbuzzerx]

^^

... and yet you can't say that Chavez' company Citco is evil big oil because you agree with his political views.

If it were up to me Jack we'd be in biodiesel cars like BRAZIL or hydrogen fuel cell technology and this discussion of "whose big evil oil corporation do you like" would be a moot point.

Actually wait-- it is a moot point.

[GiancarloC]

If it were up to me Jack we'd be in biodiesel cars like BRAZIL or hydrogen fuel cell technology and this discussion of "whose big evil oil corporation do you like" would be a moot point.

Actually wait-- it is a moot point.

Those big crooks in the republican party would never permit that. They are all hoarding wealth... republicans are bankrolled by billionaires... and they would never allow such a transformation like that in Brazil to happen.

[CowboyBob]

^^

... and yet you can't say that Chavez' company Citco is evil big oil because you agree with his political views.

I'm surprised you're not a supporter of Chavez.

You support criminal billionaires and those who legislate morality, known in the USA as the republican right wingers.

And yet you wish ill of him (you wish ill of many people you disagree with, sad) and hope he's burning in hell.

Not very christian-like Springer. Better go and count your rosary beads again. It didn't sink in the first time.

[xbuzzerx]

I'm surprised you're not a supporter of Chavez.

You support white American criminal billionaires and those who legislate morality, known in the USA as the republican right wingers.

And yet you wish ill of him (you wish ill of many people you disagree with, sad) and hope he's burning in hell.

Not very christian-like Springer. Better go and count your rosary beads again. It didn't sink in the first time.

I made the correction to explain the discrepancy.

[Kulindahr]

Take it up with him, not me. He's saying I'm going to hell. He knows nothing about me except that I'm gay. He's a Christian, expressing his beliefs that gays go to hell.

But you're the one painting all Christians with the same brush on account of one person -- so you are indeed the one with whom it should be taken up.

[Jack Springer]

I'm surprised you're not a supporter of Chavez.

You support criminal billionaires and those who legislate morality, known in the USA as the republican right wingers.

And yet you wish ill of him (you wish ill of many people you disagree with, sad) and hope he's burning in hell.

Not very christian-like Springer. Better go and count your rosary beads again. It didn't sink in the first time.

Still can't say evil big oil.

More personal attacks.

[xbuzzerx]

Still can't say evil big oil.

More personal attacks.

I don't recall anyone here ever using the term "evil big oil" except for you, actually. It's like you parroting "YOU CAN'T SAY OBAMA THE MESSIAH", why would we? We don't typically run around making our points with terms like "evil."

[Benvolio]

Chavez reduced unemployment, poverty and so forth so he did quite well at reducing inequalities... yet some here are still attacking him... he's the worst enemy of all right wingers. Chavez, Lula and others expose the fraudulent nature of right wingers... especially those in the United States. Lula said it best though... those sitting in Wall Street thought they knew everything but they really don't know JACK SHIT.

Now you want to reduce unemployment and poverty??? You have been an advocate for importing more, and more and more poverty and unemployment. When did you have your epiphany? When did you become a Republican?

[GiancarloC]

Now you want to reduce unemployment and poverty??? You have been an advocate for importing more, and more and more poverty and unemployment. When did you have your epiphany? When did you become a Republican?

What utter horse crap. Care to show where I ever said I want to increase poverty and unemployment? My oh my, republicans are the ones who want more poverty and unemployment. It serves their political agenda well. Some republicans like John Schnatter control shit companies that hire people at shit wages so they need more poverty...

[Benvolio]

What utter horse crap. Care to show where I ever said I want to increase poverty and unemployment? My oh my, republicans are the ones who want more poverty and unemployment. It serves their political agenda well. Some republicans like John Schnatter control shit companies that hire people at shit wages so they need more poverty...

You have consistently advocated increasing the number of poor and unemployed by allowing them to immigrate here.

[GiancarloC]

You have consistently advocated increasing the number of poor and unemployed by allowing them to immigrate here.

More nonsense. I advocate having a more open border with a consistent process (as far as paperwork). Republicans, much like yourself, have advocated higher poverty by advocating such economic policies that would collapse the economy. Lets get a grip please.

[Benvolio]

A more open border means more and more and more poverty and unemployment. At least have the honesty to admit what you are advocating.

[GiancarloC]

A more open border means more and more and more poverty and unemployment. At least have the honesty to admit what you are advocating.

More nonsense and a logical fallacy at that one. Don't make ridiculous assumptions about what I'm advocating. Sit down and read it.