JustUsBoys.com gay porn forum

logo

remove these banner ads by becoming a JUB Supporter.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 51 to 78 of 78
  1. #51

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by loki81 View Post
    the big deal is that the President made the recess appointment during a pro forma session of the Senate...
    "pro forma" = for the sake of form = fake = false

    If they were having fake sessions... a few minutes a few days apart... they weren't real meetings. It's all bullshit.

    It's yet another pathetic attempt for the right wing to discredit the President.

  2. #52
    loki81
    Guest

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by CowboyBob View Post
    "pro forma" = for the sake of form = fake = false

    If they were having fake sessions... a few minutes a few days apart... they weren't real meetings. It's all bullshit.

    It's yet another pathetic attempt for the right wing to discredit the President.
    Harry Reid is part of the vast right wing conspiracy? he's the one who started this tactic.

    you can agree or disagree with the concept entirely, but it's a joke to blame Republicans for a tactic that Democrats invented.

  3. #53
    GiancarloC
    Guest

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    They weren't real sessions, loki. Nobody is saying not to blame democrats or republicans... that's not the issue here. The issue is whether Obama violated the constitution or law, which he clearly did not.

  4. #54

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by loki81 View Post
    Harry Reid is part of the vast right wing conspiracy? he's the one who started this tactic.

    you can agree or disagree with the concept entirely, but it's a joke to blame Republicans for a tactic that Democrats invented.
    Is there any way to explain this so you'll understand?..... here I'll try.....

    You can blame the republicans for making a big deal out of this with their "pro forma" meetings when this (recess appointments) have been done for 90 years as mentioned in the article. Wasn't aware Harry Reid was that old.

    If you don't think republicans are out to discredit the President then there's no hope. I believe they will try to do what they did to Clinton in his second term.

  5. #55
    CE&P Secret Police xbuzzerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Posts
    9,979

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by loki81 View Post
    Harry Reid is part of the vast right wing conspiracy? he's the one who started this tactic.

    you can agree or disagree with the concept entirely, but it's a joke to blame Republicans for a tactic that Democrats invented.
    Loki why do you even enter or make these sweeping claims about political history when it's clear you don't know what you're talking about?

  6. #56
    GiancarloC
    Guest

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by xbuzzerx View Post
    Loki why do you even enter or make these sweeping claims about political history when it's clear you don't know what you're talking about?
    I agree with this. I don't see any proof for any of his claims. I guess it's more of the same faux neutrality.

  7. #57
    loki81
    Guest

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by xbuzzerx View Post
    Loki why do you even enter or make these sweeping claims about political history when it's clear you don't know what you're talking about?
    what's a sweeping claim? Harry Reid was the first person to keep Congress in a pro forma session to (successfully) prevent GWB from making recess appointments.

    “This is the first time that pro formas have been used to block recess appointments,” said Jim Manley, a spokesman for Mr. Reid.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/21/wa.../21recess.html

  8. #58
    GiancarloC
    Guest

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Loki, that's still not about now. The argument "oh the dems do it too" isn't helping the faux neutrality case. It's a false equivalency actually and a total logical fallacy. This is about appointments that were supposed to benefit the people as consumers. The republicans have their heads up the asses of big business so they bitterly opposed it in such a partisan fashion. Lets stick to the facts.

  9. #59
    loki81
    Guest

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by xbuzzerx View Post
    This, Loki.

    It's the same thing with other topics--- like Republicans defend that their Congress has filibustered Obama 270 times with "um well oh erm, DEMS DID IT TOO, they held up the emergency war funding for Iraq for like... a couple days before giving in.."

    There is not equivalency between the two parties and everyone who insists there is is only ever really trying to justify Republican partisan behavior.
    I don't think it's justifying a false equivalency to try and refute the claim that using a pro forma session is some kind of dastardly Republican tactic when it was Democrats who started it.

    on the specific merits of these exact nominations, sure, I'm glad they got appointed to their seats and I'm glad the President was able to find a maybe-legal way around the confirmation process. but on the broad level, giving the President this constitutional power now is also giving it to whoever the People of Walmart elect next.

  10. #60
    GiancarloC
    Guest

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Thanks for demonstrating the same old argument based on logical errors. It is a definite false equivalency. And it's nice trying to be cynical but at least have an understanding of the history around it. And that's nice we are now insulting voters. Keep it up.

  11. #61
    Slut Tengilethos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Orientation
    Gay
    Posts
    260

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    It is interesting to me as a foreigner what occupies the Americans in this thread.

    Obama made recess appointments of questioning legality. The Senate was technically not in recess, although it is possible that pro-forma sessions without quorum can be seen as the Senate being in recess, since the Senate could not fulfill it's duty to advise and consent regarding the President's nominees. To me it is not obvious which side has the better legal argument, but the Supreme Court will decide this so let's wait and see.

    Regarding the morality of these pro-forma sessions: They were not right when the Democrats used them, and they were not right when the Republicans used them.

    But why is the fact that the court held intra-session recess appointments as illegal not a bigger issue here? With the practical elimination of inter-session recesses, this basically nullifies the recess appointment power of the President as laid out in the constitution, and invalidates a practices that has seen heavy use for at least 6 decades. This ruling would make the appointment of John Bolton as ambassador to the U.N. illegal. George Bush had over 100 recess appointments, all illegal if this ruling stands. Will all of their actions be invalidated as well? All executive decisions? All convictions in cases where a judge or judges had been a recess appointment?

    I'm curious why this is barely worth a mention when this has possibly so far reaching consequences.

  12. #62
    GiancarloC
    Guest

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    On that note, the decision will most likely be appealed and not hold up in any other court. The court ruling was silly and ridiculous as it can potentially undermine the authority of the executive branch.

  13. #63
    Rambunctiously Pugnacious JayHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    River Quay - KC
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    24,227

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Opi it appears while I said that the judges we're legislating from the bench just to infuriate, I end up actually being correct.

    For those of you outside of the US find it confusing definitely read this article so it can explain in detail why this is a subjugation of the power of both our Senate and president.

    Posting from my phone so links are a bitch. Go to Slate. Com and search for "Senate democracy is dead"

  14. #64

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    The Senate was in recess and Obama did not follow the law. A US President is only able to make recess appointments if the Senate is not in session. The appointments are not permanent either -- the are only for a limited time.

    Other US Presidents have made recess appointments but they have done it when the Senate was in recess.

    It's not sure yet if the decisions made by his appointments can still be upheld. Since this was a court case it may well go to the Supreme Court -- they will probably make a decision soon whether they want to rule on this or not.

    The USA has 3 branches of government -- a check-and-balances system between the three branches.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tengilethos View Post
    It is interesting to me as a foreigner what occupies the Americans in this thread.

    Obama made recess appointments of questioning legality. The Senate was technically not in recess, although it is possible that pro-forma sessions without quorum can be seen as the Senate being in recess, since the Senate could not fulfill it's duty to advise and consent regarding the President's nominees. To me it is not obvious which side has the better legal argument, but the Supreme Court will decide this so let's wait and see.

    Regarding the morality of these pro-forma sessions: They were not right when the Democrats used them, and they were not right when the Republicans used them.

    But why is the fact that the court held intra-session recess appointments as illegal not a bigger issue here? With the practical elimination of inter-session recesses, this basically nullifies the recess appointment power of the President as laid out in the constitution, and invalidates a practices that has seen heavy use for at least 6 decades. This ruling would make the appointment of John Bolton as ambassador to the U.N. illegal. George Bush had over 100 recess appointments, all illegal if this ruling stands. Will all of their actions be invalidated as well? All executive decisions? All convictions in cases where a judge or judges had been a recess appointment?

    I'm curious why this is barely worth a mention when this has possibly so far reaching consequences.

  15. #65
    Sex God tigerfan482's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Columbia
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    862

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Springer View Post
    The Senate was in recess and Obama did not follow the law. A US President is only able to make recess appointments if the Senate is not in session. The appointments are not permanent either -- the are only for a limited time.
    It's hard to make that claim. The Constitution doesn't define what constitutes a Senate recess. The only thing that has been used in the past are legal opinions from the Department of Justice. The Supreme Court is the ultimate authority on what is or is not Constitutional, so we'll have to wait and see what they say. I think a good argument can be made that pro forma sessions unconstitutionally inhibit powers granted to the executive branch.

  16. #66
    Rambunctiously Pugnacious JayHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    River Quay - KC
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    24,227

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Here is that article I bfirefly mentioned above. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...of_senate.html

    It is an interesting read as the SCOTUS has already ruled on WHO has standing to demand that something done was action taken illegally. The minority party in the Senate IS NOT the legal voice of that body and therefore is not able to demand a case be heard. Niether is a disgruntled corporation who seeks to invalidate the Labor board rulings.

    A key 1997 Supreme Court case, Byrd v. Raines, says that only a majority of senators have proper standing in court to complain of presidential actions violating the rights of the Senate. Why should a private party—in this case, a bottling company being regulated by the National Labor Relations Board, which has three members appointed by Obama in January 2012—have standing to raise the rights of the Senate itself?

    Since the Court overstepped its bounds by making a ruling (primarily because each of them were republican appointees), then it goes without saying that the SCOTUS and a Chief Justice Roberts who is loath to overturn precedent will decide that the DC Circuit failed in its judgement.

    The article is mostly about inept Democratic Senatorial Leadership for those of you biologically wired to not disagree with republicans -- ever. So have a read... most of it will make you smile and hate Harry Reid even more than many left wingers do now...

    Cheers.
    Everyone can be great, because everyone can serve.
    ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.


  17. #67
    Virtus in medio stat JUB Admin opinterph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Jawja
    Status
    Partnered
    Posts
    21,085
    Blog Entries
    14

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by JayHawk View Post
    Opi it appears while I said that the judges we're legislating from the bench just to infuriate, I end up actually being correct.
    I think you may be on to something.

    Compare the ruling to the amicus brief filed by Senate Republicans.


  18. #68
    Rambunctiously Pugnacious JayHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    River Quay - KC
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    24,227

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Well I dont know that I am on to something... but I know a guy who writes articles I read on the internets and he is on to something... lol.

    I suppose we will see. I have also read (again on Slate) that the Senate rules although they did not reform the filibuster they have made it much easier to confirm appointees. So hopefully Obama can simply nominate them again and let the legal fight play out while our departments of government actually have the folks appointed to operate.

    It is remarkable that republicans get folks to buy stories about massive inept abilities of the government all the while hamstringing effective use of assets. Democrats are no better because if they would be in the minority they would pass the same scurrilous poltical bull pucky.
    Everyone can be great, because everyone can serve.
    ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.


  19. #69
    GiancarloC
    Guest

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Springer View Post
    The Senate was in recess and Obama did not follow the law. A US President is only able to make recess appointments if the Senate is not in session. The appointments are not permanent either -- the are only for a limited time.
    The Senate wasn't in session and 2 minute meetings a day don't count as sessions. Obama did follow the law. Stop making the ridiculous claim he violated the law or the constitution. I haven't seen one shred of proof for that.

  20. #70
    JUB Addict darden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Jersey City
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Partnered
    Posts
    1,239

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    too bad Jack isn't here to gloat, but it looks like he was right.

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday limited the president’s power to fill high-level vacancies with temporary appointments, ruling in favor of Senate Republicans in their partisan clash with President Barack Obama.

    The court’s first-ever case involving the Constitution’s recess appointments clause ended in a unanimous decision holding that Obama’s appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in 2012 without Senate confirmation were illegal. Obama invoked the Constitution’s provision giving the president the power to make temporary appointments when the Senate is in recess.

    Problem is, the court said, the Senate was not actually in a formal recess when Obama acted.

    Obama had argued that the Senate was on an extended holiday break and that the brief sessions it held every three days were a sham that was intended to prevent him from filling seats on the NLRB.

    The justices rejected that argument Wednesday.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...y.html?hpid=z1

  21. #71
    JUB Addict Sausy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    20,971
    Blog Entries
    2

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    unanimous ruling, too... even usually liberal votes on the court couldn't support the President's actions. Not saying Bush or other Republicans haven't acted weaselly, but Obama simply was too obvious here. Glad they all could agree on something.
    unofficial official mini meet Friday- Saturday April 11-12, 2014

  22. #72

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    This is all quite moot in light of today's US Supreme Court ruling, which was unanimous. I note that politicians didd not bring the action, but a business entity challenging the validity of labor rulings mad by Pres. Obama's interrim appointments. I think it safe to say that the decision was not made exclusively on political grounds, and certainly not because all the justices are, perforce, bigots. I note too, that this ruling will be binding on future Presidents, of whatever party. Clearly, this was a ruling in protection of the the balance of power provisions of the Constitution, which would be cast aside at the risk of tyrany.

  23. #73
    Slut smokeshadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    175

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    As I see it, what has been happening is that Congress isn't doing it's job in filling these vacancies so that the President can do his job as a manager should. He tried to work around Congress and got slapped down by the SCOTUS (as he should have). But, the onus lies with Congress to get off of it's collective corporate assets and do it's job instead of trying to repeal a law some 40 or so times without success (one would think that after the 3rd of 4th attempt, they'd grow a pair and move on ) or attempting to have the House Speaker sue the President. Can you imagine Speaker Sam Rayburn or even Tip O'Neil ever stooping that low

  24. #74
    Bammer's Papa
    Kulindahr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    on the foggy, damp, redneck Oregon coast
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Bisexual
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    101,407
    Blog Entries
    78

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Note that there was more than one aspect here, and a related aspect wasn't unanimous:

    Breyer and the court’s liberals, joined by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, read the Constitution to give wide authority to the president to make recess appointments when the Senate was on any break of 10 days or longer.
    So it sounds like the Senate is in session when it says it is, but if they skip town for more than ten days it doesn't matter what they say. So the bit of enough of them showing up every several days to transact some business, however minor, is legit for keeping the President from making appointments, but they have to convene at least once in ten days.

    "Thirty-one* states allow all qualified citizens to carry concealed weapons. In those states, homosexuals should embark on organized efforts to become comfortable with guns, learn to use them safely and carry them. They should set up Pink Pistols task forces, sponsor shooting courses and help homosexuals get licensed to carry. And they should do it in a way that gets as much publicity as possible. "

    --Jonathan Rauch, Salon Magazine, March 13, 2000

    *the number is now forty

  25. #75
    Oranje rareboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Partnered
    Posts
    32,541

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Ahhh. A Springer thread. Good Times.

  26. #76
    Do I dare to eat a peach?
    palbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Coastal Downeast Maine
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    10,116

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by Kulindahr View Post
    Note that there was more than one aspect here, and a related aspect wasn't unanimous:



    So it sounds like the Senate is in session when it says it is, but if they skip town for more than ten days it doesn't matter what they say. So the bit of enough of them showing up every several days to transact some business, however minor, is legit for keeping the President from making appointments, but they have to convene at least once in ten days.
    OR, a senator present to question the presence of a quorum.

    I question the existence of a quorum.

    Can a president (with a little help from one senator of his party) circumvent most of the Court’s limitation on the recess appointments power?

    ...., it seems that yesterday’s decision could be substantially a dead letter, so long as the Senate does take recesses longer than nine days. In other words, pro forma sessions may not count, so long as a single member of the president’s party is available to make the point that the Senate is not actually present.

    http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/06/ca...ntments-power/
    A thoughtful discussion.

    (OH Jack, I miss you and chance1.)

  27. #77
    Bammer's Papa
    Kulindahr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    on the foggy, damp, redneck Oregon coast
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Bisexual
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    101,407
    Blog Entries
    78

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by palbert View Post
    OR, a senator present to question the presence of a quorum.

    I question the existence of a quorum.
    True -- they can't exactly be in session if there's no quorum.

    "Thirty-one* states allow all qualified citizens to carry concealed weapons. In those states, homosexuals should embark on organized efforts to become comfortable with guns, learn to use them safely and carry them. They should set up Pink Pistols task forces, sponsor shooting courses and help homosexuals get licensed to carry. And they should do it in a way that gets as much publicity as possible. "

    --Jonathan Rauch, Salon Magazine, March 13, 2000

    *the number is now forty

  28. #78
    Rambunctiously Pugnacious JayHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    River Quay - KC
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    24,227

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Barack Obama Violates the Constitution

    The best part of all? Once Dmeocrats are not in the majority they will use all the same tactics and cause the republicans to be frustrated just as much as the scoundrels have frustrated our recovery.
    Everyone can be great, because everyone can serve.
    ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | About JustUsBoys.com | Site Map | RSS | Webmasters | Advertise | Link to JUB | Report A Bug on this Page

Visit our sister sites: Broke Straight Boys | CollegeDudes.com | CollegeBoyPhysicals.com | RocketTube
All models appearing on JustUsBoys.com were over 18 at the time of photography. The records for sexually explicit images required by U.S. 2257 are kept by the
individual producers of the images. The location of the records is available by clicking the Custodian of Records link at the bottom of each gallery page.
© 2012 JustUsBoys.com. The JustUsBoys.com name and logo are registered trademarks. Labeled with ICRA and RTA. Member of ASACP and The Free Speech Coalition.