I've never noticed this.
But since you have - perhaps there is a valid reason.
For example, a richer person would have the luxury of having been exposed to many more things over his/her lifetime. A richer person would have the luxury of being able to order something - and then finding out that he/she doesn't like it, order something else.
A poorer person might more often resort to the same staples - and not having exposure to a lot of things, not want to take a chance on it in front of someone else.
I've never tried caviar. If you invited me to a high-brow event where they served caviar, I might very well pass on it. And the more that it cost, the less likely i might be to try it. If you said, "go ahead take a taste - you know that it is $200 an ounce". I might be afraid that i am going to spit it out and ruin my taste buds for the evening. Now, if i had the opportunity as a child to sample these things, i would know my reaction and i would take the chance. And the $200/ounce might not scare me away.
But I think the same example could be used for inexpensive items. Am i going to try anchovies on that $10 pizza? If i worked an hour to earn that $10 - i might decide it isn't worth the risk that i will have wasted that hour. Yes, I might be missing out on the chance that I really like anchovies, but I know that i like cheese and sausage.
And if you are paying for me, i might even be less inclined to take the chance. How would you feel, after all, if i say - "Yeah, let's go ahead and try anchovies" and when the pizza arrives, I take one bite and then don't eat anything else.
It could be self-consciousness. It could be the lack of exposure. It could be some inherent pride that they know that they can't reciprocate, so they don't want to feel beholden.
it dageeoruos topic is
Gods still goin all ova world
it safe ta speacks? a 1 is ask
ist world got might a ways ta - exterminate
poor a word !st world create but no figa it but create
mac donald is learnin life aint all plastic ans fast but fast is da ways wot killin wot life is
anyway
sure awsum internet 2 got alls sorted or find universtys doin sruvey or media news discova moon ans all save
but kind ask
thankyou
tiecheese
![]()
![]()
Some interesting insights here.
insights< funny word of so supa lands
da orcale a delphi
world a swim insights build univeristys mak foot prints on moon hope aliens go HEY KOOL PRINTS we wanna buy um
but educate apes blind still of towers might a lands
or folk so invest in da play look away from da mirror ans say
all die one day anyway
there is no insights fa eons cause it all there
but let a words caue a race
ta goals not there
ans keep all in their place
ans da words
wot go nowhere
but ta cut
da day
in many way
fa da pleasure
of no measure
fa minds
enjoy
so a way
hey hey
ha
polish walls ya gonna be round long time
thankyou
tiecheese
![]()
![]()
There was a member here who had trouble with being out of work and didn't know where he would get money for his groceries from. Trust me he wasn't picky, and it's an insult to even utter the words poor and picky for those who truly are in need.
Never cease to find it strange
How at midnight things seem hopeless
But by dawn they've changed
I think your friends were just scared they'd be obligated to return the favor and take you out somewhere.
Rich people's pickiness is often regarded merely as 'good taste'.
There's little fault attributed to the wealthy being discerning.
But along with their other deprivations, the poor must give up the pleasure of being choosy or face rebuke.
on the sufferings of the world
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7pwI...?v=S7pwItrhEZo
Yes, poverty can be a culture as well as an amount of money. Not fond of it either way.
Americans need to keep their guns so they can protect themselves from gun violence just like Nancy Lanza did. And like Chris Kyle did. And like Gabby Giffords did. And like Tom Clements did.
of course -poverty- becum culture it all is got
no stop cultures of ups feedin off it wit out any question
angain wot is poverty
ans wot his affulent?
!st worlds suap dicktionarys ans Co in world ova eva check words they spit out media etc so o woteva any century? or it a for purpose ta etc so etc?
no land playin nation on planet earth is modern or medievel or backward or supa no 1 is all still fallin ova owns shit dress up as progress
ans mac donald as much a child find pretty wot is a good meal by it self even it throw away
by it ways of plastic ans interiors ways remove human out ans robot in
wot no just mac donald of usa wot may fit so a limited culture wot so easy side line humans fit da day
expensive restaurants etc play anoda way wot is no news ans da poeple sniff about in um in all lands
otda lands see so a thang of cultures so press down their skulls ans go coooooor
but from top down they same a way ans round ans round
yes this rush job
sayin obvious soooooooooooooooooooooo amaizn
anyway
if a op go say
hey ma mates wot not so full cash keep choose wot a like ans no can affords it? wot do?
not place littul mines wot is WHY POOR FOLK PICKY or dead end jobs or etc so on
ans if it about food it about food not money
ansaskin question already assume anyone read it got be affluent ans eat anythang?
make dizzy it do
anyway
is this babbullins or talkin ta brick wall?
* wall again *
ha well
thankyou
tiecheese
![]()
![]()
If a question contains a logical fallacy then it doesn't deserve to be answered. especially when it has offensive implications
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/false-cause
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal
You show courage the brave dream of
logical fallacy is top !st world ways
so great populations of everythang world ova get start on askin da questions wehre it matta!
unless choice option
folk die anyway
so wot point
hi world leadurs of gods nice day
thankyou
tiecheese
![]()
![]()
I apologize to those I've offended in this thread. I meant no disrespect to the less fortunate.
Perhaps my observations are flawed by confirmation bias. I'm not discounting that.
Never cease to find it strange
How at midnight things seem hopeless
But by dawn they've changed
it kool it kind ya cum back ya topic
less fortunate is anoda fallacy be it case fa many by 1st world measure ans ways make so wot no need in any century
planet earth is only home folk got even it just da dirt live on
UN got lot work rethinkin wot is UN
anyway
is a hope ya mates ans you work sumthang out pay fa bite eat
kool
tiecheese
![]()
![]()
To be fair, I've been broke before and I've been dirt poor as well. And at no time have I said ALL poor people are picky. What I said was from my observations over the years (that's probably tainted by confirmation bias), poor people tend to be pickier than the more affluent.
Of course there are exceptions. My "girlfriend" grew up in a very well off house hold. She won't even touch indian food with a 10 foot pole. Only recently after started dating an indian guy did she start forcing herself to eat indian food.
In other words, I do realize that if my observations were true, it would still not apply to everyone.
Some people here have offered great insights. For example, my ex. Probably the pickiest person I know. Always broke all the time. He would get upset when I take us out for anything other than McDonalds. No, I'm not exaggerating. It took me a long time to figure this out. He would always get upset after we dined out. Never told me why. Turned out McDonalds was the only thing he liked.
I can see how what I'm saying would get myself in trouble because of the politically incorrect nature of it. But I've never been a politically correct kind of guy anyway.
In my experience, wealthy people are on average more open to new experiences than poor people. If you're wealthy and you go out for dinner, you can have something out of the ordinary because if you don't like it, there's always dinner tomorrow at a different restaurant. If you're poor, you don't have the same margin for error. One dinner out and that blows through your restaurant budget for the next six months. The next year?
That is true of things other than food as well. When you can get what you want, and when you can afford to change your mind as often as you like, it is a powerful lesson in the value of variety and change. Look up "satisficing" to explain the behaviour of poorer people.
Americans need to keep their guns so they can protect themselves from gun violence just like Nancy Lanza did. And like Chris Kyle did. And like Gabby Giffords did. And like Tom Clements did.
Did they end up liking the food?
I only ask because I've been in this very same situation a few times. I admit that I'm not an adventurous eater but I'll still occasionally try new things. I can understand how it could be perceived that I was uncomfortable, but the reality was I just hated the experience and couldn't wait to leave. I just didn't want to hurt their feelings after they spent so much time trying to talk the place up.
I just want my $7.49 large bowl of Pho. danx
Balls to the walls hella fuckin awesome.
I am a little bit picky about what I eat and I know others who are also. I never noticed whether or not there is any economic correlation. People who are more open minded or who are more socially mobile might try something new, but after that they would probably develope a preference or dislike of what they tried.
This thread brought to mind something I recently heard about. Someone I know of who is recently unemployed went to a food bank and was given some food. They could not choose what they were given but were just given a bag of food. There were some items in the bag which they did not care for so they passed them on to my sister to use and not waste, but my sister is adequately employed. She was somehwat chagrined because she donates to a food bank for the poor and thought that it wouldn't be right for the donations to be used by someone who is employed. She passed the items on to another food bank to give out.
Just an FYI ...
If you are interested in hearing more on the subject check out Karel's Podcast...dated 1-9-13 Hour 1
He is an openly gay radio talk show host and comedian/lecturer/author ect.
http://www.radiokrl.com/
It is halfway down on the right side of the page.
I'm poor as dirt. Over the last week, I've consumed less than 3500 calories. This is because all I have in my cupboard is tomato soup (which I literally cannot eat; it makes me violently ill), and things that require milk, which I can't afford because I'm poor.
Oh, and I'll eat literally anything. I've made a whole meal of a tin of tuna before (yes, just a tin of tuna), and because I hadn't eaten for two full days before I happened across it, it was the most delicious thing I've ever eaten.
Yes, there's a local food bank every Friday. They usually give out one 2L of milk, two loaves of bread, two squares of margarine, assorted produce that's invariably two days from going rotten, and one of each of a dry good (which is almost always total junk food) and soup. Needless to say, I power through all of that in two or three days, no matter how much I try and control how much I eat. But hey, at least I'm eating normally for three days of the week.![]()
Do they have local churches or a Salvation Army that prepares meals? I have a store in a downtown area and I hire homeless people to do all the jobs I need done and I have helped alot of people find ways to eat every day of the week. I know it depends on the area in which you reside though. The Salvation Army in alot of places serves lunch every day.
We don't have a Salvation Army here. I live in a town of 10000, so there's almost no social support network here to speak of. I've exhausted every option I could find. The good news is that I'm hopefully going to be moving into an apartment soon that's only $400 a month (with a government rent subsidy), as opposed to the exorbitant $600 I'm paying for a one-bedroom with no windows, so I doubt I'll be starving once I get to that point. Three years of malnutrition is long enough.![]()
As a poor person myself, I'm offended by the notion that, since I am poor, it's expected that I be grateful for every moldy crust of bread that is thrown to me. Just because I don't have money doesn't mean that I should be forced to eat garbage. Every human has the right to be picky and only eat the things he or she enjoys.
Someone asked me once how I could know that I'm gay if I've never slept with a woman. I've never shoved shards of glass into my eye, either, but I don't have to give it a shot to know that it's not for me.
^
Beggars can't be choosers, Doctor
Who said anything about begging? I've never begged for food in my life. If I can't afford something, I do without rather than ask for charity. As far as I could understand, the OP never said anything about these "poor people" asking for hand-outs and as such, there shouldn't have been any expectation of willingness on their part to eat anything that happened to be presented to them.
You are correct that beggars can't be choosers but as long as there is no begging go on, people have to right to like what they like.
Someone asked me once how I could know that I'm gay if I've never slept with a woman. I've never shoved shards of glass into my eye, either, but I don't have to give it a shot to know that it's not for me.
How about—
'Those who receive food from strangers, shouldn't insult the givers'
Again, this wasn't a case of someone donating food to them. From what the OP explained, he's talking about social settings in which groups of friends go out to eat together and certain people having opinions about where they should go. The OP also said he voluntarily picks up the bill after the fact. At no point, from the OP's explanations, was there any mention of food being "given" to these people beforehand. So, again, there was no request for charity from the "poor people" and no direct offer of charity from the "affluent people" and therefore, there shouldn't have been any expectation for the "poor people" to just silently go along with whatever the "affluent people" decided.
Someone asked me once how I could know that I'm gay if I've never slept with a woman. I've never shoved shards of glass into my eye, either, but I don't have to give it a shot to know that it's not for me.
^ Oh, I didn't see all that background information; I thought people were talking about the US welfare crisis and about its poor economic performance.
^ as broad as everything else here