-
November 27th, 2012, 09:00 PM
#101
Porn Star
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
chance1
LOL
yes we should be thankful for that
a new low in "why the president is doing a good job"
he hasn't started a war
he had no money left after blowing a hole in the deficit
as for faux outrage .................. 4 dead americans .... help requested prior numerous times ...... no help provided day of attack ....... need i continue?
there's nothing faux about it except your faux understanding or perhaps caring
toot toot
Maybe you should reread my post, buddy (I think you made up stuff along the way)
Where exactly did I claim not starting wars = president is doing a good job? It turns out, in politics, there are often "lesser of two evils" scenarios and I was merely claiming this is one such case. I personally prefer Obama's handling to that of returning such duties to the GOP war machine... there is a distinction... especially when we claim to be concerned about the deaths of every American.
Last edited by ReadyWithReadyWit; November 27th, 2012 at 09:04 PM.
-
November 27th, 2012, 09:04 PM
#102
Banned
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
ReadyWithReadyWit
Maybe you should reread my post, buddy (I think you made up stuff along the way)

Where exactly did I claim not starting wars = president is doing a good job? It turns out, in politics, there are often "lesser of two evils" scenarios and I was merely claiming this is one such case. I personally prefer Obama's handling to that of returning such duties to the GOP war machine... there is a distinction.
i read it 1x
then 2x
then a 3rd time
it was the same
your last sentence said he didn't start any wars
was that a criticism? 
do tell
are you a war monger
i'm confused
your point it seemed was
bush started 2 wars
obama didn't
edge obama
course he did redeploy troops from iraq - where we got thrown out - to afghanistan
oops
not such a good move
"gop war machine" ......... all we need is an organ grindr
and a monkey
-
November 27th, 2012, 09:10 PM
#103
AshyPhoenix you can do it
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014
I like the "edge Obama." Like it's really easy to just accidentally start two really bad wars with no point. Oops. So Obama's got a slight edge over Bush. lol.
-
November 27th, 2012, 09:25 PM
#104
Porn Star
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
chance1
i read it 1x
then 2x
then a 3rd time
it was the same
your last sentence said he didn't start any wars
was that a criticism?
do tell
are you a war monger
i'm confused
your point it seemed was
bush started 2 wars
obama didn't
edge obama
course he did redeploy troops from iraq - where we got thrown out - to afghanistan
oops
not such a good move
"gop war machine" ......... all we need is an organ grindr

and a monkey
Yes... I think you got it this time around. It wasn't a very deep point I was trying to make. But that distinction is an important one... especially in context of history and our country's inability to end wars we start. And, I think that distinction is plenty is suggest:
Obama≠Bush (which is completely different from "the president is doing a good job").
-
November 27th, 2012, 09:32 PM
#105
Banned
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
xbuzzerx
I like the "edge Obama." Like it's really easy to just accidentally start two really bad wars with no point. Oops. So Obama's got a slight edge over Bush. lol.
Pres. Obama to his credit opposed the Iraq war - while a junior senator
Many of his Dem. colleagues did not - many of his key appointments did not
many of the dems who did not have been rewarded with better appointments and have more power since their vote FOR war
it's a long but good read
http://archive.truthout.org/iraq-the-democrats-war63120
-
November 27th, 2012, 09:46 PM
#106
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
xbuzzerx
And here is Chance still unable to concede that not starting two wars ad infinitum is not = not starting two wars ad infinitum.
It's a pretty easy distinction man.
He has no evidence to back up his case... it's something we've seen before.
-
November 27th, 2012, 09:49 PM
#107
Banned
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
ReadyWithReadyWit
Yes... I think you got it this time around. It wasn't a very deep point I was trying to make. But that distinction is an important one... especially in context of history and our country's inability to end wars we start. And, I think that distinction is plenty is suggest:
Obama≠Bush (which is completely different from "the president is doing a good job").
I'm getting the sense that you always like to be right
so ........... you're right
*
* u owe me
-
November 27th, 2012, 10:15 PM
#108
Virtus in medio stat
JUB Admin
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
chance1
Pres. Obama to his credit opposed the Iraq war - while a junior senator
Are you suggesting that Illinois is somehow “junior” to the rest of the nation?
Or maybe you are dismissing the distinction between state and federal?
-
November 27th, 2012, 10:21 PM
#109
Banned
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
opinterph
Are you suggesting that Illinois is somehow “junior” to the rest of the nation?
Or maybe you are dismissing the distinction between state and federal?
Neither 
Any other options?
He was like senator for what a year ?
That's junior
And he was commonly referred as such
-
November 27th, 2012, 10:25 PM
#110
Virtus in medio stat
JUB Admin
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
chance1
I don't think you got the message, but thanks for responding.
-
November 27th, 2012, 10:30 PM
#111
Seeking a free country
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
opinterph
Are you suggesting that Illinois is somehow “junior” to the rest of the nation?
Or maybe you are dismissing the distinction between state and federal?
"Junior senator" from state X is the traditional form of reference to the more recently elected senator from that state. If Senator Ugh was elected before Senator Fugg, Fugg is the junior Senator -- and still will be, as long as the two both shall serve.
"Thirty-one* states allow all qualified citizens to carry concealed weapons. In those states, homosexuals should embark on organized efforts to become comfortable with guns, learn to use them safely and carry them. They should set up Pink Pistols task forces, sponsor shooting courses and help homosexuals get licensed to carry. And they should do it in a way that gets as much publicity as possible. "
--Jonathan Rauch, Salon Magazine, March 13, 2000
*the number is now forty
-
November 27th, 2012, 10:32 PM
#112
Banned
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014
-
November 27th, 2012, 10:56 PM
#113
AshyPhoenix you can do it
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
Kulindahr
"Junior senator" from state X is the traditional form of reference to the more recently elected senator from that state. If Senator Ugh was elected before Senator Fugg, Fugg is the junior Senator -- and still will be, as long as the two both shall serve.
Yes but
you know.....
sometimes the junior must precede the senior
it's rule of nature man.
Take ownership of the situation. Don't blame others. 
I struggle with this topic sometimes.
More at 11.
-
November 27th, 2012, 11:05 PM
#114
Virtus in medio stat
JUB Admin
Re: Obama Backs Out on Promise: Troops to Stay in Afghanistan After 2014

Originally Posted by
Kulindahr
If Senator Ugh was elected before Senator Fugg, Fugg is the junior Senator -- and still will be, as long as the two both shall serve.
I don't think you got the message, but thanks for responding.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules