-
November 18th, 2012, 03:38 AM
#1
-
November 18th, 2012, 05:11 AM
#2
JUB Addict
Re: Swag style
A rose by any other name...still stinks.
That is sooo chav.
-
November 18th, 2012, 05:39 AM
#3
Try this....
Re: Swag style
Why don't we just call it Fugly instead?
-
November 18th, 2012, 05:44 AM
#4
Re: Swag style

I don't mind 'saggers' but those pants look they've got an in-built colostomy bag!
-
November 18th, 2012, 05:47 AM
#5
Re: Swag style
#$WAGG #YOLO
But I kinda like that style, tight jeans, nice sneakers. But the fact that Bieber (and people like him) wears swag makes me hate the style.
-
November 18th, 2012, 06:12 AM
#6
Re: Swag style
I won't crap all over someone else's taste, but I don't identify with it.
If they choose that image, that's fine. It's not for me, so I don't have anything to say for it.
As far as style goes, it looks confused aesthetically.
-
November 18th, 2012, 06:59 AM
#7
JUB Addict
Re: Swag style
It all depends on the wearer.....
What I find off-putting about the 'street' look, is that it's mostly worn by middle-class suburban white wannabe 'wiggers', who are in fact about as 'street' as the Queen of England.....
-
November 18th, 2012, 07:10 AM
#8
Simplistic Nightmare.
Re: Swag style
I read somewhere that swag(not to be confused with swagger, which is another word entirely) stands for "secretly we are gay".
Sounds about right, giving the flamboyance of it all, and the affinity for showing their asses.
"Being right never felt so wrong -

We must deceive to belong..."
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules