Krauthammer to Obama: 'Why the Hell' Have Rice Address Benghazi If She 'Had Nothing To Do With It? Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-shepp

[chance1]

Charles Krauthammer took the President to task for his indignation play on McCain and Graham today ........ with the Pres. pulling his usual "how dare you question my admin" etc.

"She didn't have anything to do with the Benghazi affair !!! so why send her out there to answer questions wonders Charles K
"
He defended her like a damsel in distress attacking the 2 male senators

Charles K is dead on here

incompetence or deception - pick one


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...f-she-had-noth

[JayHawk]

He sent her out because he knew she was to be his voice to the world after the election. They went out with thew current intelligence as reported to them by the CIA AND stressed that more details were to follow and they couldn't be certain yet.



Request this be moved to the Susan Rice thread as that is where this conversation appears to already be held....

[opinterph]

Request this be moved to the Susan Rice thread as that is where this conversation appears to already be held....

It doesn't seem to contain any original content, other than announcing the death of Charles K.

[JayHawk]

It doesn't seem to contain any original content, other than announcing the death of Charles K.

I know I will get booed or publicly chastised for being a meany mean head BUT I thought Krauthammer was dead for years.....

[chance1]

a jayhawk request .......

LOL

let's condense threads based on my needs

hahaha

[chance1]

It doesn't seem to contain any original content, other than announcing the death of Charles K.

you couldn't be more wrong

it's a RESPONSE to Pres. Obama's press conference

which was held TODAY

what part of NEW is that not ?

please explain

[opinterph]

you couldn't be more wrong it's a RESPONSE to Pres. Obama's press conference which was held TODAY what part of NEW is that not ?

please explain

Your opening post is confusing, at a minimum. For example you provide the following quote:

"She didn't have anything to do with the Benghazi affair !!! so why send her out there to answer questions wonders Charles K
"

And yet I don’t see that sequence of text within the linked article.

Maybe it would help if you provided “your own personal criticism, illustration, clarification, parody, or summary of the work you are quoting” in a way that is comprehensible.

[chance1]

Your opening post is confusing, at a minimum. For example you provide the following quote:



And yet I don’t see that sequence of text within the linked article.

Maybe it would help if you provided “your own personal criticism, illustration, clarification, parody, or summary of the work you are quoting” in a way that is comprehensible.

LOL - that's interesting

I think your response is bizarre at best

i think if you listened to the video attached you wouldn't be asking questions like this

It's almost as if you're not very up to speed with the story at all - which has been in the news for quite some time

and speaking of bizarre .......... "the death of Charles K?" WTF is that

[opinterph]

i think if you listened to the video attached you wouldn't be asking questions like this

I read your personal commentary. I did not watch the video and your remarks did not inspire me to do so.

[chance1]

^ well if u didn't watch the video and weren't inspired clearly no need or reason to comment

Sorta curious in a bad way that u chose to

[opinterph]

Thread Closed.

Please do not use the forum as a news ticker. It is reasonable to assume that members have access to their own news sources. [Link]