The new Monday freshman has been announced on Twitter.
The new Monday freshman has been announced on Twitter.
If I heard it right, Philip said to Carson in the shower, "I'm not going to lie, you're probably the favorite one I've ever been with." Scripted or not, that sentiment was written all over Philip's face throughout the scene.
I now think Carson Bones Philip is the best scene Philip has made.
Yes yes yes to the new freshman-the best since Sean!
Here's the quote from the CFSelect Twitter.
If we're going by the calendar definition of "Fall," here are the guys that it could be:Just watched this weekend's CF Select and it features the return of a stud we haven't seen since fall of 2010! I'm stoked!
Julian Dec 16 2010
Brody Nov 25 2010
Ryan Nov 18 2010
Jude Nov 16 2010
Ethan Nov 11 2010
Carter Nov 9 2010
Joseph Nov 4 2010
Matthew Oct 27 2010
Neal Oct 13 2010
It is possible that CF Select is defining "Fall" the way that the CF Twitter feeds define a "week," in which case, the definition is a little more malleable and might include:
Wesley Dec 28 2010
Griff Sept 17 2010
Lucas Sept 9 2010
Liam or Luca Sept 2 2010
Brick Sept 7 2010
Dalton August 21 2010
The guys from this list who showed up in our poll of who we would like to see back include Luca/Liam, Ethan, and Julian.
I'm guessing Ethan, but Joseph is my dark horse guess.
I'm holding out hope that Joel will do more scenes. I'd prefer sooner rather than later, but just Joel in general would be great.
Carson has turned out some great scenes. He's not showy at all and that is always a turn on. Plus he really pays attention to his partner and he knows how to suck cock.
The new guy is DEFINITELY pretty!
Studybuddy, looking at your list I'm struck by what could be THE porn news event of the year. Could you IMAGINE if they mended fences and it's BRODY?? Now THAT would be something special.
Hmmmmm...maybe the prodigal return of Lucas??
Oh, did y'all see the adorable behind the scenes pics of Aiden & Cameron clowning around. They were posted on the Corbin Fisher social networking & on Queer Me Now.
How funny are these boys?
This guy is a super cutey but the raging issue is will he follow thru with guy/guy. These Monday dics like Ripley and Chandler who go to CF, pick up some quick cash, and then flake out are frustrating as hell.
And man ....that chemistry between him and Phillip was scorching hot. Phillip's body was quivering. You can tell Carson pushed all the right buttons with Phillip. I hope that bring Carson back for more topping scenes.
As for the big debut over the whole return of someone from 2010, I would say the obvious fan favorite is LUCAS. I would love it if he came back. However, I would like to see GRIFF return. That was Kenny's extremely tall little brother. I would like to see Kenny & Griff tag team a guy together.
And yes, the new Freshmen is hot. Hope it doesn't turn into a Robbie, Ripley scenario though. ....and I just remember someone last week saying that CF had a major decrease in quality freshmen?!? Wonder if they changed their mind?
And another pic, you know, just because he's definitely an improvement over the last several freshmen...
A handsome face and a nice body. Hooray! [Also, I'm strangely attracted to his armpit...]
A very, very, very long time.
Let us pray.Let's just hope that his dick is a pretty one as well.
In the second pic, he looks like he knows we want to shove our faces in that armpit and bush, and is totally inclined to let us. a;ldskfja;sldfk I don't even know when I developed an armpit ~thing.In that first pic, he's quite innocent-looking, but in the second pic, doesn't he look like he has a naughty streak too?
I blame Brent.
So the new Freshman...HOLY FUCK!!!
Face, body, hair, skin tone, just everything. He's the chicken mcnuggets of porn models.
Wonder if they'll shave the new guy bald before or after his first shoot?
Oh MY!! That 2nd picture......yikes!
The title of it should be "Innocence Lost."
He looks like someone you've know all your life and who you've always thought of as an innocent kid when he suddenly turns to you and says (in a deep, breathy voice) "I know....all about...dirty....things..." and you feel it right in the pit of your stomach.**
Well done, CF (and you don't hear ME say that very often!)
** pardon my momentary detour into Flannery O'Connor territory
Nice to see we're finally getting an attention-grabbing freshman at CF. That said, I'm not quite as bowled over as most here seem to be. The solo will tell the story, although as far as I'm concerned if there's no guys-only sex in his CF future he can exit stage-left immediately.
^is that "Good Country People". She would not let her mother turn her dust into joy . . .
To string this out a little more [and, no, I'm not Philip's agent] Philip looked so good in the Carson scene. He always has had potential but for me for one reason or another he just missed being really hot until now. CF needs to pair him up with more of their slow-lovin' tops. I guess that would be Sean currently.
Another one of the beauties of Carson Bones Philip was that the tempo seemed so unhurried, as if the guys' own desires paced the shoot. Whoever directed outdid himself. Again, I wish CF listed director/editor credits.
Interesting side note, with the unstable CF server (any better results guys?), it will be interesting to see if the novelty of seeing all the CF regulars bareback cuts into the idea you can charge for each video, especially if Sean Cody is delivering bareback sex for the monthly fee with a good rotation of new hot guys...
Have you never heard of Cavorject? There are ways to get a reliable hardon without any attraction whatsoever. (Not to mention what others have said about youthful horniness and careful editing.)ReadyMade - what's the one thing you don't need to (a) do a love scene in a movie (b) light your balls on fire on Jackass or (c) eat a bowl of scorpions on Fear Factor?
A hard on.
The penis is a funny thing. And all the Viagra and Cialis in the world is not going to get a guy hard if there's no sexual attraction. For the guys on sites where they watch a straight porn video while some guy blows them, you can see how they can pretend that it's the chick on screen. But what most of the models on CF do and the intimate positions they are in, they can't pretend it's not happening and if they are disgusted by it, then fluffer or no fluffer, they won't get hard.
Well, I doubt that most, if any, of the guys on CF are "disgusted by" the sex acts that they're doing, but what does that mean? Are we running with the theory that "real" straight guys are disgusted by other men's bodies?But what most of the models on CF do and the intimate positions they are in, they can't pretend it's not happening and if they are disgusted by it, then fluffer or no fluffer, they won't get hard.
Are you also of the opinion that there has never, in the history of the world, been a heterosexual male prostitute who serviced male clients?
But here's the thing for me (everybody else's mileage may vary, obviously).
Way early on, Sean Cody did a video called "The Experiment", two straight guys having sex (I forget the names of the guys involved. Dylan and Eric, maybe?). The scene reflected this - both guys were very hesitant. The sex was as mechanical as it gets. The guys barely touched each other (other than absolutely necessary when, y'know, having sex with somebody), and were terrified to even look at each other, keeping their eyes desperately focussed on the porn in the background. The scene was over and everybody ran for the hills.
Contrast, say, "Josh and Dru" (hell, let's go watch "Josh and Dru" just for the fun of it). Mr Fisher has told us that both Josh and Dru are straight (Josh said he was into women in his profile video, and I'm sure I can remember a write-up for Dru that he liked Latin women).
And I'm not even talking about the sex-scene (as scorching hot as it was). I'm talking about part 2, the shower scene afterwards. The two guys are just mauling each other. Dru's just trying to devour Josh. And you know, the scene's over, they're not really getting paid anymore, they're just showering off before going to get some lunch. And Dru spends the entire clip looking like he's a second away from bending Josh over and going again.
(to be fair, if any of us had Josh naked, soapy and wet, all to ourselves, we'd probably be about to do the same*)
But that's my point.
I'm not arguing that there's no straight guys at CF, because obviously there are (who are exhibitionists, closetted, curious, comfortable enough with their sexuality, or else desperately penniless enough, to appear in gay porn).
But you said it yourself. This is a business, and Mr Fisher has to sell this line (regardless of whether it's true or not) to make money.
Again, I don't doubt there are straight guys. But you can't determine a model's sexuality by what Corbin tells you.
* -- it's not that Dru has gay sex on camera, it's that he enjoys it so much. Maybe it's just me, but whenever Dru's on camera, my gaydar just explodes. That's the read I get from him. It's entirely a subjective thing and I can't explain it beyond that, but yeah.
Look at the grin on his face as he's getting spit-roasted by Elijah and Simon. Or the way he devours Josh (at one point asking Josh, "Maybe next time you can top me?" Yeah. That's a heterosexual thing to say).
(hell, watch "Dru and Austin". During the interview segment, Dru and Corbin both mention this rule that apparently prohibits the models from hooking-up off-camera. Here's the head-scratcher. If the heterosexual men need to be told not to have sex, off-camera, then I doubt they're 100% heterosexual)
^^^^^^And lets not forget the best straight guy exuse of the reason he chose gay porn 1st was that he cant pay his T-mobile bill. Lol
As for Carson, I just cant get into him at all, at least facially wise. If I ignore his face i can get into his scene like with Zeb, but other than that its a complete fail.
And I just learned that Dawson and Pete are the VP's of CF. And Connor's up there too. Seems like Connors interview on The Sword sparked a crap load of arguments, even one of CF's little lackeys git into it with some there. Go figure...
I would change your above statement to say "he appears to enjoy it so much". Your comment "(at one point asking Josh, "Maybe next time you can top me?" Yeah. That's a heterosexual thing to say)." That's a wise thing for Dru to say if he wants to be in another video. It's a good business decision on his part. It draws the viewer in. He doesn't care whether it is a "heterosexual thing to say" - he cares about whether it is an appropriate thing to say that will continue the fantasy that CF is selling.
You already said you can't trust what Corbin says. The only reason for Corbin's rule prohibiting models from hooking up off camera may be to make viewers think that there is a need for the rule. It may be a joke among the models. Or it may also be used to keep the models out of Ashley's pants (or any of the other girls). I'm guessing that Ashley is enough of a professional that this isn't a problem. I have a rule that I don't shit in the kitchen (ok that's a little crude), but the rule is superfluous, I wouldn't do it anyway. But if I told people I had that rule they might wonder what kind of guy is he that he needs that rule. So, I think Cf's rule on hookups is part of the cf fantasy.
Funny thing about Dru. He has the name "Dru" tattooed on his left calf, doesn't he? (or maybe his right calf, I'm not sitting at my normal computer atm). Unless he got the tattoo of his own name (possible), I wonder who the actual person is who that refers to? I've always wondered.
Okay. But I probably worded that wrongly. The fantasy is straight guys enjoying gay sex -- but just because Dru (or any of the models) actively sells the fantasy, that doesn't automatically mean that it applies to the model in question.He doesn't care whether it is a "heterosexual thing to say" - he cares about whether it is an appropriate thing to say that will continue the fantasy that CF is selling.
I mean, that's what I was saying before. Dru said that to sell the CF-fantasy -- but by itself, that doesn't mean that he's 100% straight (and thusly didn't mean it). Mauling Josh in the shower with that much feeling, no, I don't think someone just there for the paycheck would've been *so* into it.
Edit - on that point, there have been a few models who don't maul their partners in the showers afterwards, and they've been around just as long (if not longer) than Dru, so it wasn't exactly necessary for him to say to keep his job or anything.
HeheheheOr it may also be used to keep the models out of Ashley's pants (or any of the other girls).
I confess, I never even considered the ACS side of things. But I generally don't, actually. I liked the "Ashley dominates..." videos. Except, well... I'm sure Ashley is quite lovely, but I wanted Dawson and Cain just tying one another up and having sex, you know? Why can't they just have a bit of light bondage in the normal ACM scenes (someone picks up a discarded t-shirt or something and ties his partner's hands behind his back with it? It wouldn't hurt)?
But no, you're right, it might be there for that reason as well.
--- Dru ---
This issue about the straightness/gayness of the models on CF has been debated on this thread since it began years ago. Since we'll never know the real truth, it seems pointless to even try to figure out who is or isn't. But I'm not ever one to stifle a debate so by all means go at it.
To me the more interesting angle on this issue isn't the innate sexuality of the models themselves but the selling, as a positive, of the models straightness. And the real question we should be asking is why does it even matter as a selling point? I have been posting and reading on this thread forever, I have also read other threads about CF on other blogs (as I assume most of you have) and I have noticed something very odd. I don't ever recall seeing anyone actually post that they joined CF because the models were straight. Quite the contrary in fact, what I have seen over and over again is subscribers to CF lament on this and other blogs that a particular model was not in fact gay *. I know that's how I personally felt, When I subscribed to CF it was despite of the straight guy sell job not because of it. To me when a model was identified as straight, it actually knocked him down a peg in my book (but not so much that I would not want to see him in action if he was hot of course). So this begs the question, why does Corbin insist on his models heterosexuality as a selling point for his site? I can only assume it's because he is hearing from a significant portion of his subscriber base that they like seeing (allegedly) straight guys having sex contrary to their nature and pornographers like Corbin can hardly be blamed for catering to that appeal to make money. And his is not the only company pushing this angle, almost all the other big ones do and many even advertise it in their names (brokestraightboys, newyorkstraightmen, straightfraternity, straightboysfucking, etc). So why the dichotomy? Why is there this overwhelming push on scores of gay web sites propagating that the men you see are really straight, when gay men on blogs keep posting that they prefer to see other actual gay men? The only answer I can come up with is that those of us posting on blogs are in the minority and that there is a silent majority of gay men who subscribe to these sites based on this "straight is best" sell job but who will never post about their likes on blogs like this for fear of being labeled self-hating/loathing. large numbers of gay men like watching porn only if they think the guys are straight and are being tricked (baitbuddies, ungloryhole), paid (brokestraightboys, baitbus) or coerced/forced (straighthell) into gay sex. Or that gay men only exist to subserviently service straight men (codycummings, newyorkstraightmen), and the reasons why are for bigger brains than me to figure out. I, and many of you may not like it, but thats seems to be the way it is. To be clear, I am not trying to start an anti "gay for pay" movement, because I actually don't care about a models innate sexuality and I don't subscribe to heterophobia. As I wrote above if the models are hot and perform well on camera, whatever their orientation, then that's fine by me, so long as their alleged heterosexuality isn't placed on some superior pedestal. Personally I think it would be nice if somebody who participates in this "straight guys are better" trend, reversed itself and was more gay positive, maybe that'll be corbinfisher, but I won't hold my breath.
(* The caveat being that they not be effeminate. Even amongst the "we like em be gay" crowd, there seems to be the feeling from some that the models shouldn't exhibit any behavior that can be considered too gay. Randyblue debuted a model last year named Kurt Madison who was among the hottest I saw in 2011, but a huge amount of the discussion about him on the blogs was how femme he was when he spoke, and that this was a bad thing (similar to what happened to Spencer on CF). What a pity if that nonsense is what kept RB from using him again.)
Well "Dru" has a modeling profile on that model website that CF seems to recruit everybody and they mamma's from. And if its true like "Trey" was, his CF name is just a short version of his real name. So maybe that has something to do with it?
Btw that new freshman from last week's interview is up on Pete's Attic. Im actually interested in what he has to say.
Having said that, I still watch the scenes and see something - like the way that Dru played with Josh's ass in the shower - and think that they have to be gay or bi.
(Way to go, Patriots!!!!)
Last edited by yankeesfan; January 14th, 2012 at 09:40 PM. Reason: spag
^How is "Jake Andrews" f.k.a. "Ben" faring at RB? I thought he was stunning, and his scene with Jamie was scorching. But he was pretty universally reviled on the Sean Cody threads for being 'too gay'.
Captain, it recently occurred to me that the 'straight' label may be more for the models' benefit than the customers. This is especially the case for Corbin Fisher. Sexually some may be Kinsey 6+, but they still want to hold onto their 'straight' creds.
If you believe that was actually Dawson in that interview (and I don't see any reason why not), he gives a plausible story of being sexually open, but prefers to play house with a woman. I'll buy that.