JustUsBoys.com gay porn forum

logo

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 51 to 61 of 61
  1. #51
    Slut SGTMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Columbus
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Open Relationship
    Posts
    172

    Code of Conduct

    Re: New Guidelines

    Ahhhh, a wild admin appears....


    First off let me apologize, using the term libtard was used to get attraction (which it has to it seems). There is no "quote" per say (begin the nick picking) but more a general overall feeling. Although I stand by the meaning behind it (here comes the ban) that is sounds like something from the left, free expression, unless we disagree.

    The idea that the Fetish area can be a place for non-judgmental ideas and free expression of fantasies are being superseded by an under written threat in the guild lines. Case in point...Barebacking. It is legal in every country I know or have lived in. There are no legal ramification to any person that advocates the idea as far as I know. But it is clearly stated that it will be allowed, then you will be looked down upon by powers above us. It is almost a case of we hate it but have to allow it. How would you feel if a parent or close friend said they hate you for being homosexual but will allow it only because they cannot legally get away with blocking it?

    However if the statement I made of a exact quote must be held up to the exact letter than I would have to say that the words in question are "...a place for free non-judgmental discussion, no matter how out there some of it might be. IOW, we're not proposing a "one size fits all" configuration..." So feel free to talk about everything, but beware you will be judged and might be banned. A wise man once said "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength."

  2. #52
    Slut SGTMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Columbus
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Open Relationship
    Posts
    172

    Code of Conduct

    Re: New Guidelines

    And may I ask, why is the word "libtard" the only thing that is of importance here. I thought we are here to make a better fetish forum? Only focusing on a burned out bulb does not make a crystal chandler any less priceless in a palace.

  3. #53
    Sex God LittleDove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    862

    Code of Conduct

    Re: New Guidelines

    Frankly, I'm finding this whole approach to the subject so disheartening that I find myself wishing you guys would bring back the feature that let people block out the posts from specific forums entirely.

    What you've now set up is comparable to the Special Olympics, where everyone who wanders by gets a pat on the head and a medal because everyone who shows up gets a pat on the head and a medal because no-one who enters is allowed to get anything else other than a pat on the head and a medal. It is not only demeaning, it is degrading.

    Frankly, if my ego were so fragile that the only way I could react to someone not liking what I do or the things I'm into would be to run off like a startled chipmunk, then I'd consider I had a much bigger problem to be dealt with than just being involved in a paraphilia or four. I don't need other peoples' approval -- most especially their forced approval -- to keep my sense of well-being afloat. So what if they don't like what I do? They're free to have their opinions, as am I, but if they really want to get in my face about my business, I just tell them to fuck off.

    What's the most disheartening about this, as evinced by several of the posts above, is the manifest dismissal of anything like a common-sense approach to any subject, and an absolute rejection of even broaching the subject of health and safety. Several years back, I dealt with a relatively inexperienced young man in his early 20s who wanted to get into some aspects of BDSM. His situation was somewhat complicated because, as a paraplegic, he was confined to a wheelchair. In sessions generally lasting 2 to 3 hours, usually once or twice a week, for the better part of the year, I worked with him on the mechanics of what he could do, how he could do it, and/or work around his limitations, and also dealt with the health and safety issues involved, some of which were specific to his disability.

    Because of the attitude that's being expressed here, and its apparent unquestioned acceptance, I don't think I could have those same conversations here ... at least not without someone objecting and probably reporting the post(s) and trying to get me banned. The promise of kind of Mickey Mouse type experience makes the whole thing not worth bothering with, hence my earlier-expressed wish for some way to make this whole area of the site disappear from my screen.

  4. #54
    Virtus in medio stat JUB Admin
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Jawja
    Status
    Partnered
    Posts
    22,606
    Blog Entries
    14

    Code of Conduct

    Re: New Guidelines

    Quote Originally Posted by SGTMaster View Post
    Ö why is the word "libtard" the only thing that is of importance here.
    Iím not convinced that it is; however, it is the only thing I asked you about.


    Quote Originally Posted by SGTMaster View Post
    using the term libtard was used to get attraction
    I think thatís called baiting.

  5. #55
    Slut SGTMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Columbus
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Open Relationship
    Posts
    172

    Code of Conduct

    Re: New Guidelines

    Quote Originally Posted by LittleDove View Post
    Frankly, I'm finding this whole approach to the subject so disheartening that I find myself wishing you guys would bring back the feature that let people block out the posts from specific forums entirely.

    ...

    Because of the attitude that's being expressed here, and its apparent unquestioned acceptance, I don't think I could have those same conversations here ... at least not without someone objecting and probably reporting the post(s) and trying to get me banned. The promise of kind of Mickey Mouse type experience makes the whole thing not worth bothering with, hence my earlier-expressed wish for some way to make this whole area of the site disappear from my screen.
    I would assume from what you written that you are talking about my posts. If I am incorrect, sorry. I can only go off what I read and inflection is pretty much impossible on the internet.

    I am not saying this should be the Special Olympics. However, you are right there does need to be common sense. I was not (nor ever) talking about someone saying, hey I like your idea and here are a couple fun tips but be careful about (insert danger). I was talking about the people the jump on, call you sick and then run off.

    I agree with you in your assessment about being worried about what people think about you online. Sadly, not everyone has either the guts or stupidity to put up with what people say. Hence why I keep asking if the forum was going to a flame zone (might make it easier at times to just tell a person to stfu on a thread sometimes). But we are also dealing with fetishes, which is like coming out twice, never fun to some people. And you run into the problem of turning into another gay.com (well at least in my neck of the woods). Got a bunch of pricks, ran everyone off and it is sad little old boys club.

  6. #56
    Slut SGTMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Columbus
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Open Relationship
    Posts
    172

    Code of Conduct

    Re: New Guidelines

    Quote Originally Posted by opinterph View Post
    Iím not convinced that it is; however, it is the only thing I asked you about... I think thatís called baiting.
    I was not trying to bait. Merely gather attention (rather like most of the titles are written as vulgar as possible to get a person to read them) to the fact that verb-age can affect how something is taken. If I had said "statement that does not match up with what was said earlier" it would not be an issue. However, I used that word (sorry but in the conservative word it normally means say one thing, do another) to illustrate that while well intentioned, it can be written wrong. I was not trying to get anyone pissed off and go off on a tirade by using that word, hence why I said I was not trying to bait. The same can go for how the guild lines are written. This exchange is a perfect example of what was written before my offending word. When a person reads the guidelines that state you cannot preach like there is no tomorrow (again not saying a friendly warning if in context should be ban hammer worthy) they could be put off by constant preaching in those guidelines. The tone will be all they remember and focus on and all the rest is forgotten. Rather like this situation. Next thing you know, they will find the little X at the top right.

    If I could impose, what says you Mr. Admin about all this? We all have yapped about it, I am curious to hear what you have to say.

  7. #57
    Virtus in medio stat JUB Admin
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Jawja
    Status
    Partnered
    Posts
    22,606
    Blog Entries
    14

    Code of Conduct

    Re: New Guidelines

    Quote Originally Posted by SGTMaster View Post
    Ö If I could impose, what says you Mr. Admin about all this? We all have yapped about it, I am curious to hear what you have to say.
    I consider your question too broad/vague. I have been following the developments in sequence and congratulate Centexfarmer & Quasar for their work to help bring about some new and much needed guidelines for this sub-forum.

    If you have a more specific question, please know that I will try to provide you a reasonably prompt and friendly answer.

  8. #58
    Slut SGTMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Columbus
    Gender
    Male
    Orientation
    Gay
    Status
    Open Relationship
    Posts
    172

    Code of Conduct

    Re: New Guidelines

    Quote Originally Posted by opinterph View Post
    ...If you have a more specific question, please know that I will try to provide you a reasonably prompt and friendly answer.
    No specific question per say, just curious about your overall feelings on the matter. I do agree the mods have been great dealing with all of this. Personally, I think a huge heartfelt thanks should go out to every person that has spoken up on this topic. We may not always agree with what another person says but I think we all can agree that is better when they are able to say something.

  9. #59

    Re: New Proposed Guidelines

    verry good

  10. #60

    Re: Posting Guidelines

    Only my balls.

  11. #61
    Are u haleloo ya ? Telstra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Gender
    Male
    Status
    Single
    Posts
    31,061

    Code of Conduct

    Re: Posting Guidelines

    Sorry too much to read.
    I don't read "Terms & Conditions" when installing software.


    NEVER LISTEN TO A ONE SIDED STORY AND JUDGE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | About JustUsBoys.com | Site Map | RSS | Webmasters | Advertise | Link to JUB | Report A Bug on this Page

Visit our sister sites: Broke Straight Boys | CollegeDudes.com | CollegeBoyPhysicals.com | RocketTube
All models appearing on JustUsBoys.com were over 18 at the time of photography. The records for sexually explicit images required by U.S. 2257 are kept by the
individual producers of the images. The location of the records is available by clicking the Custodian of Records link at the bottom of each gallery page.
© 2012 JustUsBoys.com. The JustUsBoys.com name and logo are registered trademarks. Labeled with ICRA and RTA. Member of ASACP and The Free Speech Coalition.