boys walking in sweatpants/mesh shorts

[FanofFiction]

I saw a straight couple in an adult video store one evening, the guy was wearing sweat pants. I was so tempted to take a picture. He was buff, some tats, and with a huge chubby looking at sex toys with his girl. He had a great bubble butt too.

[mike1491]

[FanofFiction]

Sudden interest in playing basketball...

[AllMan]

Uh oh..are these LDS underwear? Better take the pic down!!!

[blackbeltninja]

No disrespect but can you take the pictures of LDS garments down. I would really appreciate it as I still consider them sacred.

Sacred underwear?

Gosh. Now I've heard everything.



-d-

[alberta2010]

what are LDS garment...and whats the big deal about them ???just wondering

[fidget]

my dad and i used to go running and he would always wear lycra or spandex. no lie. i would admire his fat dick and square ass thru that awesome gear. what a stud. i'm getting a few pairs of short short running shorts and tiny tshirts to wear to the gym. I usually wear whitey tighties, a jock or bakinis, but i'll free ball no doubt if it means showing off my basket. i love when my dick shows thru for the world to see

[taylorj03]

[cocksucker4use]

Saw a young paki dude free ballin in some sweats the other day on the street. Hypnotizing by the swinging pendulum between his legs. Seein guys at the gym in really baggy basketball short, yet they still show a healthy package is too fuckin hot.

[StSinner]

They're magic don't you know?

Typical non response.

[StSinner]

Uh oh..are these LDS underwear? Better take the pic down!!!

Is this comment based on some silly axe to grind over a certain California proposition? Also, just because the sanctity of the garment means nothing to you doesn't automagically mean they are insignificant.

[StSinner]

what are LDS garment...and whats the big deal about them ???just wondering

The LDS garment is, in a phrase, "an outward sign of an inward covenant". When LDS go through the temple, they make covenants that reflect their devotion to God. The garment is worn as a constant reminder of the commitments one has made with God. They offer no "magical protection" as some anti-Mormons, critics and ignoramuses may be inclined to hackle over. Wearing sacred garments is not exclusively an LDS cultural norm. Ancient and modern religions wear sacred garments as symbolic to their devotion to their God(s).

[mike1491]

my dad and i used to go running and he would always wear lycra or spandex. no lie. i would admire his fat dick and square ass thru that awesome gear. what a stud. i'm getting a few pairs of short short running shorts and tiny tshirts to wear to the gym. I usually wear whitey tighties, a jock or bakinis, but i'll free ball no doubt if it means showing off my basket. i love when my dick shows thru for the world to see

You used to admire your own dad?!

[AllMan]

Is this comment based on some silly axe to grind over a certain California proposition? Also, just because the sanctity of the garment means nothing to you doesn't automagically mean they are insignificant.

lol...nope. Actually it's based on YOUR silly request to remove a pic of your "sacred" LDS garments in a "hot guys in shorts/pants/underwear" thread. That would be like me asking them to remove a pic of a dude wearing a cross in a "hot guys in gold necklaces" thread!

...and besides, the word is "automatically", not automagically.
Here, need this:

[Lefty]

Stop bleating a dead horse allman.

The lad said automagically and for one,

I like the way it was used

to emphasize his point...

not necessarily as validation,

but sure as hell for emphasis!

[blackbeltninja]

The LDS garment is, in a phrase, "an outward sign of an inward covenant". When LDS go through the temple, they make covenants that reflect their devotion to God. The garment is worn as a constant reminder of the commitments one has made with God.

Does this commitment and covenant include hanging around in the porn sections of a gay-porn-orientated online forum? I know the LDS don't mind gay members provided they're non-practicing - sketchy at best, IMO - but don't they also expect their members to not be getting themselves off manually?

In which case, frankly, I find myself wondering exactly what you're doing in here. Hot Topics I could understand, since there's very little wank fodder in there, but here in the fetish and porn sections? I'm a little skeptical.

-d-

[StSinner]

lol...nope. Actually it's based on YOUR silly request to remove a pic of your "sacred" LDS garments in a "hot guys in shorts/pants/underwear" thread. That would be like me asking them to remove a pic of a dude wearing a cross in a "hot guys in gold necklaces" thread!

...and besides, the word is "automatically", not automagically.
Here, need this:

It was used intentionally.

[StSinner]

Does this commitment and covenant include hanging around in the porn sections of a gay-porn-orientated online forum? I know the LDS don't mind gay members provided they're non-practicing - sketchy at best, IMO - but don't they also expect their members to not be getting themselves off manually?

In which case, frankly, I find myself wondering exactly what you're doing in here. Hot Topics I could understand, since there's very little wank fodder in there, but here in the fetish and pornsections? I'm a little skeptical.
-d-

I'm not a member of the LDS church any longer. I was excommunicated several years ago for apostasy and heresy. I gave a speech in symposium that was considered threatening to the membership.

As for being here, I'm working on my Master's thesis. Part of the inspiration was D. Michael Quinn's book "Same Sex Dynamics Among Nineteenth Century America: A Mormon Example". Another part of the inspiration comes from my sociology of human sexuality course I took in my undergrad. Another part of the inspiration is the influences of pop culture on sexual dynamics. I'm fascinated by the various influences that determine one's fetish, fear, and sexual psychology.

[KaraBulut]

No disrespect but can you take the pictures of LDS garments down. I would really appreciate it as I still consider them sacred.

If a MOD would like to take it down, it will be OK by me.(Post #346)

Moderators note: The images in question are of a young man wearing an LDS temple garment. However, the model in question is not an LDS member- the image is from a porn site- www.mormonboyz.com. There are several other threads in the porn forum that feature this website:
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/thre...rom-Mormonboyz
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/thre...MormonBoyz-com
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/thre...MormonBoyz-com

[AllMan]

Stop bleating a dead horse allman.

The lad said automagically and for one,

I like the way it was used

to emphasize his point...

not necessarily as validation,

but sure as hell for emphasis!

just STFU mrs. lefty! Your sole purpose is to seek out everything I say and provide your fucked up two cents to it, isn't it? You have been doing it since the beginning of time....remain quiet until I post a comment, then you personally attack me. Is your self-estmee THAT low, am I that much of a threat to you? Is your fucked up life that miserable where you have to stalk me and comment on any- and everything I post? Grow the fuck up and get a life! Frankly, no one gives a shit whether you "like the way it was used"! Good for you, does that make your self esteem level even out now? Have you emphasized your loving and conditional support of StSinner yet? Now you can hop off his dick! You, ma'am, need prayer...maybe you can get StSinner to pray for you!

[mike1491]

[StSinner]

Moderators note: The images in question are of a young man wearing an LDS temple garment. However, the model in question is not an LDS member- the image is from a porn site- www.mormonboyz.com. There are several other threads in the porn forum that feature this website:
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/thre...rom-Mormonboyz
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/thre...MormonBoyz-com
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/thre...MormonBoyz-com

I have contacted the site administrator inquiring about the membership of the models. Per LDS policy, the garment is to be worn by members or persons who have been through the temple. Wearing such garments outside of membership or endowment can lead to legal issues as they are not a public product. It is distribution and redistribution of the product or similar material in any format not meeting LDS standards can result in a lawsuit.

[StSinner]

Nevermind.

[Lefty]

@ StSinner,

Hello new person. We haven't met yet but I like words and I like the way you manufactured the one earlier in this thread.
As you familiarize yourself here you will learn that some of our jubbers are incapable of using a bit of wit or humour when
they attempt communications. Grow past them, it is a valid place. So, welcome and see you in the threads.

@allman,

Without going into a long discourse , I average 14.14 postings per day and started in Jan of 05. You started your current
identity here as allman in Dec of 09 and posting an average of 1.10 per day. I presently have received more posts, p/m's
and comments thanking me for my contributions here than you have total postings. With 3 threads and many comments
and p/ms to keep me busy on a daily basis, I do not have the time nor patience nor interest in stalking you, waiting quietly
and or pouncing on your drivel. You did your usual job of castigating a poster for voicing his opinion.
Others teased noob StSinner, (our Afrikanner Ninja for example), you were unpleasantly rude.

I consider your puerile attack on my character as degrading and offensive...however, rather than complain to our already
overstressed mods/admins, I elect to continue scrolling past the bulk of your drivel. As to the remainder of your diatribe
directed at me here, make note...I have no intention of practicing STFU and quite a few (several anyway) people have been
known to be interested in stuff I say.

30

-----------------------------
now, These guys may not have sweat(y) pants...but what about you?

[BENDERBOY]

Jesus all this rumpus over a pair of sweaty knickers, mess.

[yhtang]

I like this guy. His boys may not be that visible through his swear pants, but the body more than compensates for that. And he looks quite nice too. He is welcomed in my bed anytime.

[quasar]

...Wearing such garments outside of membership or endowment can lead to legal issues as they are not a public product. It is distribution and redistribution of the product or similar material in any format not meeting LDS standards can result in a lawsuit.

That would be with regard to manufacture and distribution of the garment AND claiming that it is 'authentic mormon underwear'. There are several companies selling reproduction mormon underwear with not a litigation in sight. In addition, there is no law against publishing images of them.

I could understand your being offended if you were a practising Mormon, but I find your indignation of something that you have rejected somewhat confusing.

Regardless, we have no intention of removing any images of models wearing either authentic, or reproduced, Mormon undergarments.

[unloadonme]

Regardless, we have no intention of removing any images of models wearing either authentic, or reproduced, Mormon undergarments.

Those young men appear not to lack the means of reproduction.

[blackbeltninja]

I'm not a member of the LDS church any longer. I was excommunicated several years ago for apostasy and heresy. I gave a speech in symposium that was considered threatening to the membership.

As for being here, I'm working on my Master's thesis. Part of the inspiration was D. Michael Quinn's book "Same Sex Dynamics Among Nineteenth Century America: A Mormon Example". Another part of the inspiration comes from my sociology of human sexuality course I took in my undergrad. Another part of the inspiration is the influences of pop culture on sexual dynamics. I'm fascinated by the various influences that determine one's fetish, fear, and sexual psychology.

None of which really explains your indignation at the depiction of a Mormon in his official underpants.

Wearing such garments outside of membership or endowment can lead to legal issues as they are not a public product.

An aside, I'd be interested to see if there was any legal liability at all. Can you patent clothing or uniforms, especially based on the typical existing design of pants in general? What's so special about them to make them the official underwear of the Church of LDS?

An additional aside: use of words like endowment (and membership) in your argument is setting the rest of us up for hours of sheer comedy gold, and you up for endless piss-taking. You've been warned...

-d-

[AllMan]

@allman,

Without going into a long discourse , I average 14.14 postings per day and started in Jan of 05. You started your current
identity here as allman in Dec of 09 and posting an average of 1.10 per day. I presently have received more posts, p/m's
and comments thanking me for my contributions here than you have total postings. With 3 threads and many comments
and p/ms to keep me busy on a daily basis, I do not have the time nor patience nor interest in stalking you, waiting quietly
and or pouncing on your drivel. You did your usual job of castigating a poster for voicing his opinion.
Others teased noob StSinner, (our Afrikanner Ninja for example), you were unpleasantly rude.

I consider your puerile attack on my character as degrading and offensive...however, rather than complain to our already
overstressed mods/admins, I elect to continue scrolling past the bulk of your drivel. As to the remainder of your diatribe
directed at me here, make note...I have no intention of practicing STFU and quite a few (several anyway) people have been
known to be interested in stuff I say.

speaking of "bleating" a dead horse (of which the correct phrase is either "beating a dead horse" or "bleating over a long dead horse")!!

Anyway I won't even address you by your screen name, because judging from your screen name and deranged posts, it seems that's the only side of your brain that's halfway functional.

You claim you don't personally attack me, yet you somehow perfectly get the spelling/capitalization right on everyone else's scream name and PURPOSELY put mine in lowercase every time you address me. My screen name is not meant to be in lowercase--the A and M are capitalized in case you didn't notice. But that's neither here nor there; thanks for helping me make my point and proving your inconsistencies and hypocricy! Did ridiculously centering the response and singling me out once again make you feel better? Did that give you your daily dose of much needed testosterone/self-esteem booster? Hope so if it did, I am happy for you---whatever brings you joy and works for you! I know self-glorified "perfect" people, who live in their own little cube, like you don't think they need it, but I will continue to pray for you. Good day mate!

[AllMan]

Does this commitment and covenant include hanging around in the porn sections of a gay-porn-orientated online forum? I know the LDS don't mind gay members provided they're non-practicing - sketchy at best, IMO - but don't they also expect their members to not be getting themselves off manually?

In which case, frankly, I find myself wondering exactly what you're doing in here. Hot Topics I could understand, since there's very little wank fodder in there, but here in the fetish and porn sections? I'm a little skeptical.

-d-

...YOUR...request to remove a pic of your "sacred" LDS garments in a "hot guys in shorts/pants/underwear" thread...would be like me asking them to remove a pic of a dude wearing a cross in a "hot guys in gold necklaces" thread!

That would be with regard to manufacture and distribution of the garment AND claiming that it is 'authentic mormon underwear'. There are several companies selling reproduction mormon underwear with not a litigation in sight. In addition, there is no law against publishing images of them.

I could understand your being offended if you were a practising Mormon, but I find your indignation of something that you have rejected somewhat confusing.

Regardless, we have no intention of removing any images of models wearing either authentic, or reproduced, Mormon undergarments.

None of which really explains your indignation at the depiction of a Mormon in his official underpants.



An aside, I'd be interested to see if there was any legal liability at all. Can you patent clothing or uniforms, especially based on the typical existing design of pants in general? What's so special about them to make them the official underwear of the Church of LDS?

This

[Lefty]

ohohoh

look look look

it is postings #380-381




There. hopefully...All better now.

[bradlee119]

[/CENTER]

That's lovely!

[mike1491]

[mike1491]

[nastyboy45]

[StSinner]

That would be with regard to manufacture and distribution of the garment AND claiming that it is 'authentic mormon underwear'. There are several companies selling reproduction mormon underwear with not a litigation in sight. In addition, there is no law against publishing images of them.

I could understand your being offended if you were a practising Mormon, but I find your indignation of something that you have rejected somewhat confusing.

Regardless, we have no intention of removing any images of models wearing either authentic, or reproduced, Mormon undergarments.

No disrespect, but I don't believe I indicated that I was offended. This isn't a play on words or implications. As this is a public forum then I do realize I was out of place asking, as a former LDS, to remove photos. Sincerest apologies.

You did enlighten me to the news that companies were reproducing the garment. Thank you. I knew of other Mormon based churches using and reproducing the garment but only for ordinance work and for members to wear. I won't ask what companies because I don't want to come off as a douchebag or a bigot.

As for the legality of reproducing pictures, etc., I was wrong. I contacted the Church Office Building in SLC to inquire about the policies. Once the garment is purchased by a member with who has been through the temple, it is by the conscience of the buyer what to do with the product. Again, sincerest apologies.

[StSinner]

None of which really explains your indignation at the depiction of a Mormon in his official underpants.



An aside, I'd be interested to see if there was any legal liability at all. Can you patent clothing or uniforms, especially based on the typical existing design of pants in general? What's so special about them to make them the official underwear of the Church of LDS?

An additional aside: use of words like endowment (and membership) in your argument is setting the rest of us up for hours of sheer comedy gold, and you up for endless piss-taking. You've been warned...

-d-

I explained why I was here because another asked.

I did realize that the usage of the word endowment would beg a sexual response or snicker. That's okay, when i actually matured to the age where I could understand the different meanings...I snickered too. And still do on occasion.

[mike1491]

Here's another of this guy

[mike1491]

[mike1491]

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

Here's another of this guy

KOOL ha ans extra
ha

[mike1491]

[kendoggie]

I have contacted the site administrator inquiring about the membership of the models. Per LDS policy, the garment is to be worn by members or persons who have been through the temple. Wearing such garments outside of membership or endowment can lead to legal issues as they are not a public product. It is distribution and redistribution of the product or similar material in any format not meeting LDS standards can result in a lawsuit.

Dude, you were excommunicated and cast into outer darkness--as if they have the power to do so--so what do you care.
The undergarment is not in scripture, so don't worry about it. They betrayed you.

[devildog]

What a drama about some pics of religious undies. Doesn't the first amendment cover the freedom to use religious symbols in an artwork? I think it does. Some people might find it controversial or offensive, or not much of an artwork, but that's all subjective and that doesn't make it illegal. If you want laws like that, try Saudi Arabia or Iran.

[mike1491]

[devildog]

[mike1491]

[FanofFiction]

What is he doing?

[BillyT]

^Strenght training.