Wow pixel, that one is a bigg'un!
Wow pixel, that one is a bigg'un!
Wow, look at the load!
This guy - Omer - is also known as Latino porno star Tony Alvarez - he's in Skateboard Sliders 3 among many other films. But I love him no matter what people call him or what country he's supposedly from!
oops - Omer's photos were posted on 7/19.
Yeah, I was wondering what you was talking about!
Very nice indeed arjun Thanks for sharing and welcome to the family
Don't know about this pic - could be Indian... what d'you think?
Hard to tell from that angle!
Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.
Arjun, do you know where your pornotube video is from? As in, which DVD it is etc?
Pixel, I would say he's Indian enough!
Anything else? Does anyone have any more to share?
What a dick
Not bad at all...
This is my first post. Just wanted to say thanks a lot for your sharing, You guys are really very cool.
Course we are. Welcome to the crew!
Holy Prostate Exam Batman! That was AMAZING!!
That guy doesn't look Indian?
Any more stuff? I'm looking for vids now!
Dear PixelHerder, I love your taste in men!
that Omar is HOT! super hot.
mmmm...... Omar.... does anyone have any videos of him? I wish that site would let me download them.
I wanna see him in a vid! *cries!*
I need more!
oh hell yeah! lpve them indian guys...
Wow - some really hot guys in that collection!
I think you'll find there are many, many different types of Indian guys - you'll be surprised. Indian guys working in call centres are not just the only type there are - you will find them light and dark, tanned and hazel, tall and fat, exotic and antique... I find the ethnic look (tanned and dark hair) a huge turn on... so Indian is so very apt!
Oh no - what has this thread turned into!
But since it has, let me add to it.
Zack darling, the first thing that struck me about your little essay back there was the little bit where you said 'Even India today is not one nation but rather a collection of nations, the different nations within India seem to have a cultural underpinning but they are still quite distinct with different heritages'. This is so utterly wrong. No proof is needed to know that India is recognised as one nation in present times. Yes, it used to be a collection of very different people, and it still is, but India has always been an ecclectic mix; it's one of the places where civilisations have thought to have started from (like the discovery at Bhimbetka, for example). The Indus Valley civilisation is possibly the first proper civilisation to have sprung in India and this was followed by the Vedic civilisation, at which time India had already taken shape, albeit loosely.
The idea that India was a word that 'you' British gave us is also preposterous. Granted, it was named Hindustan before (and also Bharat) - and India is no doubt the present product of many years of British occupation - but the word India has existed for a long time. It originated from the Indus river most probably... here is an extract from the Bible:
1:1 and 8:9, where the extent of the dominion of the Persian king is described. The country so designated here is not the peninsula of Hindustan, but the country surrounding the Indus, the Punjab. The people and the products of India were well known to the Jews, who seem to have carried on an active trade with that country (Ezek. 27:15, 24).
Regarding Asoka - he was already a Hindu at the time but converted to Buddism much later; so it would follow that Hinduism was an established religion at the time.
One thing to understand about India is that because it has such a turbulent past, a variety of inhabitants and many other things besides, it should always be seen in the context of a culture. Britain too is indebted to many other cultures and people: Anglo-saxons, Romans, Vikings etc. But India has only ever been ruled by people from within its culture like the Moghuls and Persians etc. It was only the British occupation that was from such a distance.
The words 'cilvilisation', 'empire' and 'nation' are 3 different words. The Moghuls for instance were a civilisation who had an empire, but never a nation. From my understanding, Emperor Asoka's times are never referred to as 'Ashokan', because he ruled the Mauryan Empire.
But to put us all back on track: Indians, as people, should never be looked over as an homogenous group; they are very varied and different, and not all have small dicks, for instance, and neither are all dark. There are some damn hot Indians' about! Ahem.
I'll take a dravidian any day of the week!
That's the spirit, Ophelia! lol
I guess that ended that.
Any more vids?
I liked that little erudite intervention from students of Indian history and culture.
Turned me on a bit y'know
And yes Eurimouse - on with the real thing
Bring on a smoking brownie
Do tell me how that turned you on a bit - there's a fetish that many people don't know about! LOL
Just before I retort back - I'm Sikh so that makes me 'fit' in your books, Zack.
The next thing: you mentioned that a language defines ethnicity/nation and you also point out that India has many languages. That is incorrect. It doesn't have as many languages than dialects. If you know anything of the major tongues in India, namely Hindi, Urdu or Punjabi, you will know that all 3 lanaguages are interlinked and very similar. What's more, Bengali, Gujarati, amil and every other language that exists in India is very similar to each other. So from your theory, this would mean that there is only 1 true ethnicity/nation - my point exactly.
Secondly, you keep referring to Pakistan like it was never part of India. Let's not forget that the WHOLE Pakistani region was once part of India, undeniably, before the partition in 1947 - of which the history, I am sure, you are all too familiar with, since you keep implicitly highlighting the fact that you are better than us somehow.
And thirdly, the Mughals used to live in present-day India and came from the region that is now present-day Pakistan (formerly India). For this reason, they were Indians... Pakistanis' only exist because of their own state now.
And just to finish off: our vision of India is without doubt much more glamourised and correct than you can ever believe. Illusionary and incorrect, I think not; you'll find that that rests entirely with you.
Cliffox, I think you're absolutely right... they are hard to get... but I think some have been uploaded in this thread!
Does anyone have any more vids/pics?
Zack, I am punjabi - and since you seem to think you know more about my motherland because you study some bruk down course that's obviously been catered for the white man - I'll have you know that ALL Sikhs are usually Punjabi's anyway.
For a British person who studies South Asian studies, I would've thought you possessed more of an inclination of understanding, but you probably only want to study it so you can spread even more shit about the fragmented Indian culture, which, may I point out, is all due to the British anyway. But you don't see us moping and groping about it. We've moved on, but you guys still can't get over the fact you got booted out of a country you obviously wanted under your wing.
Just because a country is of the same ethnicity doesn't mean it's more of a 'truer' country than people who are all the same. Britain, in that case, is not a 'true' country on account of it being multi-ethnic and multicultural. How about looking in your own back yard before you start poking in others?
India and Indians' are proud of their heritage. We're happy to sleep with the fact that our country is so varied and ecclectic, housing many toungues, cultures, belief systems and people - and they're all happy to be known as Indians, so why should you question it?
Gujrati and Bengali may be more related to Urdu, Hindi and Punjabi - but Tamil does have words that are similar to Telugu, Marathi and Kannada, which, if you stop being so bloody ignorant, you will see all are inter-related anyway.
As an afternote to your ridiculous knowledge: the Taj Mahal has never been proven to have been a Hindu Temple; nor did I say Moghuls were Indians - they just lived in India (you need a knowledge of religions to work that one out).
I just hope you're learning something here, because the way you're going, you're so gonna fail your exams! LOL
taj mahal a hindu temple lol
from knowledge the prince/king built it for his wife as a burial place and he was about t build his own across the riv known as the black taj mahal but his son did not let him ( btw, they were muslims so where did a hindu temple come from?) and where are you taking this class? our history class in highschool was more accurate, but since eurimouse, me and others who are indians know more about our culture then whats in the textbooks, its like how you know more about yours then we do, i was born and raised in canada but i still dont know a 100% of the other cultures here, and pakistani's have a lot of similar thing with india not just the few places that line the loc, i am half paki and half indian pakistanis and a good chunk of india follow islam the only main differences we have religion, we all wear similar clothes, food, heck all watch indian movs, soap operah, and music, the only reason there a fights between pak and india are because of brits if they didnt make pakistan then there would have not been all the bloodshed, riots and stuff between hindu, sikh and muslims, through all these years
( no offence to anyone)
Yeah, I was a little Disappointed when I went to India, didn't see any of those Bollywood types, even when I went to New Delhi, the majority of them are so frail and skinny. Kind of like watching Mexican TV the soap stars just don't look Mexican, they look more like from Spain or Italy. But on the other hand, your pics are really great of these Indian guys and I am sure I will find my Indian dream boy one day.
Cheers Bidude Bhai (if I can call you that)
Well I hope this makes wise man Zack learn a little more about non Punjabi hot guys than he did from his erudite University.
So much for learning ALL about South Asia in a 101 course in some fucked up town in the western hemisphere ...
And Euri - chak de phadde - pal
Show it to the ignoramuses in this great thread you launched
not that there is anything wrong with discussing these issues, but there is a separate thread for these things. This thread is for pictures and videos.
And just to back you up about the Taj Mahal being a Hindu temple: there is a conspiracy that the Taj Mahal was a converted Hindu temple. For more about this, read PN Oak's books (who, by the way, questions much else of Indian heritage). But I think grand ol' Zack is reading and believing a little TOO much of that.
If there is one good thing that has come out of Zack's ignorance though, is more action on this thread
Nice link, SxC_RaScAl!
Cant resist telling Zack, since he repeatedly identifies his nationality, Im so glad we knocked you British buffoons out from our home by 1947.
And never mind how his 101 course influences him - we Indians all consider ourselves one nation - pretty much a mix of ethnicities but one proud nation all the same.
Foreign origin of rulers notwithstanding we KNOW that they all absorbed themselves into mainstream Indian culture - except of course the last and should I say the least imaginative of the lot.....
In any case we've never felt the need to speak in terms of nationality in the crudely ethnic manner that Europe used and imposed upon the rest of the world - and which dear Zack supposes is the last word in the making of a nation state.
Also Im ever grateful that you Brits chose not to integrate with us, hiding away in your artificially created enclaves and cantonments - unlike the Mughals, Kushans, Parthians, Bactrians and even some Greek and later Persians, not to foget the Arabs (who of course chose a trade route to join us).... all of whom came, lived and loved the land they chose to conquer - and whom we learnt to respect and admire because they ingrained in themsleves the idea that is India.
So we're are doing fine without tainted Anglican blood in us. Thank you very much. You left only a language behind (and maybe the legacy of the world's worst bureaucracy) - thanks to which we can at least let our disgust of you be known more universally.
Of course, I promise this is the last time Ill speak on this matter. Im not normally racist in my approach to life.....
But given an arrogant twit, who thinks he's the cat's whiskers because of some introductory course on South Asia he's attended - I like to set the record a little straighter than it has been in this thread.
And that mainly because youve been crudely opiniated, grossly underinformed, and very disparging of non- Caucasian ethnicities that contributed to the making of my country, Zack. Something which I feel more than slighted about.
Now back to the pics...
That was the best comeback ever! That's what you call tasting your own pill lol
Well This thread supposed to be all about Sex and Glamours.
Not about History and what you think about certain Ethnic Group.
Dear Zack why not start something like I HATE INDIAN.
Or for Arjun I HATE BRITISH.