yep - this
progressives twisted arms to get OBL banned yet jews for hitler is ok somehow
pretty fucking lame shit
Printable View
If the economy is the most important issue, why the heck would anybody vote for Mitt Romney who led a state miserably with a terrible record? How does one explain what? He left the governorship after three years and with a shitty approval rating. Something else I will explain: HAve you seen the polling in Massachusetts? People in that state HATE HIM. 47th in job creation... big whoopie doo.
Anybody who CARES about the economy shouldn't vote for Mitt Romney. He has no real plans besides more platitudes.
The man's tax plan is completely IMPOSSIBLE.
Anytime I hear someone saying "Romney is good for the economy"... I think that's a lame argument with no real proof. Romney is shit for the economy... he'll line up the pockets of the rich and the rest of us will suffer. INCLUDING MINORITIES.
And Latinos are favoring Obama 70-30%... and we got hit harder than the rest of the country. Most Latinos know that Mitt Romney is bad news.
^^
Let the mod's do their job. Frankly I'm sick of all the self-appointed mod's in CEP.
... and I'm speaking from the position of someone who has felt the "wrath" of two.
(*8*)
How ironic. :roll:
Hey guys here is what Massachusetts think of Romney:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...bama-1804.html
17-20% in the two latest polls... in favor of Obama. Why is that? Can anybody explain this? How is this possible? Mitt Romney was governor in the most liberal state blah blah blah...
Hello Peanut gallery!! I'm back!!!
Well Chance evidently the Romney that got elected in Mass was several iterations and about faces ago. Think Romney #29847562377 could still pull that off? How do you know what he's going to do? He changes his mind like every 1.3 seconds, and that's on his slow days.
Nope, you still look like you are simply in the anyone but Obama camp.
True? False? ...Only the shadow knows.....
You should say thank you to all the people that made this thread look like something other than personal spleen at a poster who got under your skin.
In theory that should be the case. I'm not so inclined to believe that an increase in GDP is going to necessarily lift people out of poverty. Added to which, we can't buy rights. A rich nation doesn't equate to a happy nation. I think the all around package counts.
I certainly hope you are right about Romney. If he wins the presidency, i will probably be around to say I TOLD YOU SO if gay rights are set back. :P
Well said, Jack. I obviously disagree with your views immensely, but I do not question that you nor other Romney supporters are doing any less than than voting your conscience. Even though we are all gay... we all have different circumstances, backgrounds, aspirations, and priorities.
In terms of the thread topic, language like "Jews for Hitler" is clearly over the line and does nothing to promote enlightening conversation in the forum... nor does a lot of the other over the top language that results from people letting their emotions get the best of them.
That being said, JB18's initial thread did resonate with a lot of people... including a lot of more "reasonable" people I might add... for a very good reason. Voting for a Romney/Ryan ticket is UNDENIABLY bad from a civil rights perspective for gay people (shockingly a pretty touchy subject on a gay forum)... and noone on either side seems to be disputing this fact... the dispute seems to be over whether other issues are more important. And some have taken offense to JB18's "we will remember" line, which, quite frankly, I do not see as that "threatening". But, still, I will attempt to phrase a similar point slightly differently. If you vote for Romney, I am far less concerned with you worrying about "me remembering" and more concerned with "you remembering". Now, granted, we are arguing about the future... which, naturally comes with uncertainty... even though the evidence seems to strongly suggests otherwise... perhaps a Romney/Ryan ticket won't be as bad (just bad) as some of us anticipate. But, in a hypothetical world where Romney wins and enacts legislation/appoints justices that indeed turn the clock back on gay rights... and our community suffers as a consequence, I would hope Romney supporters would say, "Gee... was that gamble really worth it?"
Dr Drew is hot. I'd do him.
Old and tired argument. It's not all that defines you but as far as so many fundamental rights go, it's ALL that law and society sees in you, and arguing that there's more to you won't change that one bit.
I am still not clear - was the topic directed at me, or at JB18? I can't see the OP..
It always makes me snicker when people trot out the "I'm more than just gay." Why must one be "more than that." What exactly is "more than that." Why do some people hold this up as some kind of ideal?
...BUT BUT BUT I like small bunnies and unicorns and they aren't gay shit, and that's all...
OK but you (general you) are STILL a fag who likes unicorns and bunnies!
I mean, what precisely is this supposed to say? Do they keep their gay in a little box under the bed and fondle it happily in the dark of night?
Being straight does not "describe you as a person." Yet they never ever say that. Because it damn well does describe you as a person and sexuality is a fundamentally HUGE human drive, that affects and colors just about everything we do.
OK so I lied, I know exactly why guys say that but if I tell you, I'll get one of these:
[Text Removed by Moderator]
So you'll just have to guess.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah, I prefer to remember his hotness. You's such a bitch to take that from me.
guess the drink is kicking in
decent and measured BP has morphed into nasty BP
sort of a common occurrence
what it's about is nasty terminology that not oughta be used
because gays for romney isn't remotely close to jews for hitler
not factually
and not reasonably
it was nice for you to be nice earlier
and it clearly wasn't you
Do you expect total and utter agreement from everyone in your life at all times to be validated?
I am a guy on the internet that likes to talk to people about politics, for christ sake.
Really buddy. Enough with the whole Drama thing. This thread was a pop off of the other one, and so just let it go.
^ Well, chance1. You've made it clear how you feel about me, BostonPirate, and others on here. What do you think of centex's response to your thread? You're conspicuously leaving him out of the discussion. And he's the one that actually believes you're a "Jew for Hitler." Is this genuine outrage, or are you really just targeting individual members here?
no i'm just puzzled by the jekyll hyde thing u got working
since u promote the fact that you're drunk often while posting i just figured the morph had a trigger
the thread isn't about me
it's about decorum on the forum
specially jews for hitler
it's pretty simple
and i had let it go then u dropped ur stink bomb
lol
You guys are funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAmqP6hStds
Jack, it's against the CoC to reference PMs between members.
I only bring it up, chance1, because you're harping on us on multiple threads and holding us to this critical standard that we need to disavow this "Jews for Hitler" comment in a baiting thread you've started towards an individual member. I've disavowed it. Others have done it. Somehow Centex is exempt from this criticism, and he's the one actually agreeing with the statement? Well, after dealing with your outrage all day, forgive me for kind of getting sick of receiving the brunt end of it.
All right kiddies, there is already an authority about this, I think it's high time someone enforced,
GODWIN'S LAW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
LOL
...reducto ad Hitlerum...
Kills me every time
(see what I did there grin)
u don't need to disavow anything JB
was hoping you/some would - and some have - i consider that a good thing
others who haven't and are on record NOT - that's a good thing too
provides .......... clarity
as for centex, he posts war and peace posts that i can't get thru and if i do, i have no idea what he's saying
outrage all day? try being on the non obama voting team
that's outrage all day ...... every day
but ok ok
i thought i had explained my POV re: your "consequences" post a while back and figured that was it
then BP dropped his turd and u followed up with urs
but ok ........ for now
^I like to think that I write some pretty good War and Peace posts myself. Guess they don't count. :(
i included my whole post vs. your cut/paste bullshit luv
and your "attempt" at gotcha is sad
but it's YOU baby so embrace it
- - - Updated - - -
they're just hard to stay with
dropped his turd. Buddy you need to stop. We were here when it went down, and this is just a bitter splinter of something else. Now just because I said in one thread that you had a place here, doesn't mean I intend on pretending to step in line with your beliefs or be accused of wounding you.
What's sad is that, after all the awful and childish shit you say about posters individually and as a group on a continual basis you get you panties in a bunch over a legitimate ANALOGY and throw a temper tantrum about it like a three year old ALL FUCKING DAY.
I am.
Baiting is the all purpose term for pushing a fight... sometimes so, but other times to point out the hypocrisy on the other side's arguments. The mindset on much of the left, as is the right,(this being predominantly of course a left leaning forum) is the absolutely superiority not only of their values but of their character as people...the other side is pretty much less than fully human, motivated by callous and nasty natures....to be derided and at best condescended down to. I definitely am not the right wing reactionary I'm probably thought of here and I don't expect to be validated nor want to be. But I don't consider those thinking contrary to myself either right or left in themselves bad people because they dont hold my views. I am pro gay rights period....I am supportive of some level of gun control....I am pro-life but I support the rights of women to opt for abortion in cases of rape and incest....a number of other things but I don't pigeonhole those who don't completely share my outlook as villains, or tools. It depends on the person.... yeah, we are talking about politics on the internet. So if it's not totally serious, not life and death why the absolute refusal to seriously venture away from personal biases towards some kind of understanding for other positions not one's own. If you don't give one inch on just about anything, you're taking this as life and death. You don't have to agree with me all that much but to just acknowledge sometimes you don't have all the answers and you could ask a few more questions while you're at it. I know I don't have all the answers....I know I'm not the intellectual equal of many here by far.... I am wrong more than I'd like to admit. I give in to my biases sometimes. Let my temper get the best of me and I'm ALWAYS typing stone cold sober. "Jews for Hitler" may be provocative but it's not provoking. It's shining a light on those who are blind to their own excesses. Truthfully, most every thread is a baiting thread if that is considered to be the reason this thread was created as most point to good guys and villains. Typically liberal vs conservative but sometimes the other way around.
It is a TOTALLYlegitimate analogy. 120% LEGITIMATE. And it must be employed time and time again. Voting republican means one is endorsing evangelicals who control the party... including the Vice President candidate who is vehemently anti-gay in every regard. Jews for Hitler is right on the money. To hell with Godwin's law. This is something far more fucking serious.
Btw, I also support the Jews for Hitler thing. Other than outrage, can someone give a well arguments reason for why the comparison (not its stating but its merit) is wrong?
I haven't, a cruel thing to do to a boy, that.
A zebra is black and white!
says you.
in fact it's perfectly legitimate.
hitler made his thoughts on jews and their place in society perfectly clear for years prior to winning election in 1933. the nuremburg laws should have been a surprise to absolutely no one, but there were jews who either didn't believe he hated them as much as he claimed, didn't believe he would ever have the power to make good on his wishes, or who put economic resurgence (the "great equalizer") above all else in the false belief that a rising tide lifts all boats. It doesn't.
When someone tells you to your face that you don't deserve the same civil rights that they themselves enjoy. BELIEVE THEM.
You want to support that? Go right ahead, it's your right, but don't expect other people to be congratulatory and full of praise for throwing them under the bus.
:rotflmao:
...and here we think we're so much more intelligency and meaningful and stuff.
Of course he's not Hitler. It is NOT an analogy between Mitt Romney and Hitler, it's an analogy about a group of people knowingly voting against their own interests and supporting a candidate who makes no bones about what he thinks they deserve in society. It's an analogy about a group of people fooling themselves into thinking the candidate can be controlled, doesn't mean it or that other issues are of greater importance.
the only hitler that is funny to me. Off subject but . . . you have to pay homage to Mel Brooks best movie maker of all time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCUfkMkVbwo
And SPRINGER brings it HOME!!!! ..|