On the show, he is in high school.
Printable View
On the show, he is in high school.
[QUOTE=Willie Boy;6873688
And yes, any nude pics taken of someone before their 18th birthday in the US (where the servers for the site are) ARE classified as child porn. But enough about that.[/QUOTE]
Um....nope. Nude pictures of minors are in of themselves not considered pornographic. Although the rest of your post is spot on (because this is a porn site that intent would be assumed), the law does make a distinction between nude images of minors for art (legal) and those for erotic purposes (illegal). Although individuals have gotten in trouble for having nude pictures of youngsters, there were enough reasons present to assume an erotic reason.
Mods: Note that I'm agreeing with the logic of of the ban, just not this person's interpretation of the law.
RG
Actually, I'm not sure if he's playing a character who happens to be a minor. They don't do the age thing on iCarly;)....Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedragon4
RG
Yes... on the show his character is a high school student(my guess is about 15) but in real life he's 18 so I don't know why a character he plays is important.
I love that kid, he's so sexy and cute. Yum...and those pics, pffff *shivers* yum
Glad you like him. If anyone has any thoughts/fantasies they wanna share, feel free.
Cause he plays underage. It's stupid but really not that complicated.Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
Ok I get that, but still I'm not posting any pics of him in character so I don't know why that's even an issue.
Is the argument about underage posting still going on? The pics the OP put up are fine as they have not been deleted. It's pretty simple, don't post any pics of people taken before they turned 18.
And I've been following that rule so I don't understand why it keeps getting brought up.
..................
Well the 2nd weight-lifting one was removed because he was only 17 when that was taken....Quote:
Originally Posted by ManticoreX5327
A pic got removed so rules aren't being followed. And it keeps getting brought up cause you brought it up. Not a big deal. We are all just stating what you can and can't post and how silly some of the laws are. I still think that is so ridiculous you can't post pics of the guy who plays Edward in character on this site because he plays a 17 year old but then you can argue he's a 100 something year old vampire but since he died at 17 you can't post his Edward pics! Tell me that isn't hilarious and crazy all at once!Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
Well I'm not really into Edward but yeah, since technically speaking his character is actually over 100 years old pics should be fine. As for that pic I got it from a site that said he was 18(don't remember where exactly) so I didn't know. And this thread isn't strictly for pics anyway. If people wanna discuss how hot he is or talk about some of their fantasies that's welcome too. I started this thread to see if anyone else was a fan of Nathan and for fellow Nathan lovers to drool over him together.
BTW since were not allowed to have any imagery of him in character since he plays a high school student, then technically speaking shouldn't that video clip from iCarly have been removed too?
But you CAN post pics of Edward. The rule applies to pornographic fakes of him in character - not to stills or video clips from the film. News item videos with minors in them are replaced with links. The iCarly video would be okay providing all the actors in the video are over 18. I haven't had a chance to view it yet though...Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedragon4
Sadly, according to IMDB, Miranda Cosgrove (Carly) and Noah Munck (Gibby) are not 18 yet and are both in the vid. Miranda turns 18 in May, but Noah wont be 18 until sometime in 2014!Quote:
Originally Posted by quasar
^ Well that saves me the trouble! Thanks WB. :)
Wasn't there a huge argument about this on some Twilight thread and mods said no images of him in character could be posted? I do remember that. No one said anything about fakes from what I recall. I barely remember though. Like I have stated many many times I was always a guy who loved manly men with big hairy arms and chests. But the debate is interesting to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by quasar
^ Keep an eye out for a new 'Sticky' that I'm creating. All the posting guidelines will be in one simple thread!
Does this mean I can still post links to his underage pics as long as I don't post the actual pictures?Quote:
Originally Posted by connermt
Glad I could help.Quote:
Originally Posted by quasar
No, the rule regarding images is not about to change or be relaxed. I hadn't noticed that link (now removed). Videos have always been treated slightly differently. You can post links to videos where he is over 18, but other people in it are not.Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
I found a drawing/sketch of Nathan Kress. It wasn't drawn from any real picture of him so I'm assuming that's ok since his age can't be determined in a drawing.
LOL, now I am thinking you are crazy or a stalker.Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
^Bite me. Lots of people have celeb crushes (thats pretty much what this forum is about), that doesn't make them crazy stalkers.
Technically speaking I'm not wrong so it should be allowed, but I want to make sure first.
Providing he doesn't look under 18 as per the Code of Conduct #2, it wouldn't be a problem. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
Looks like we have a go, as Quazar's reply implies.Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by quasar
I get that. It just sounds funny that you happen to have drawn pictures of him laying around your house.Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
They're not laying around my house idiot, I found it online.Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedragon4
*** image removed - created before 18 Nov 2010 ***
I know there's legal pics of him out there somewhere. I won't give up until I find them.
Mike- glad you're on the job- would like to see more of this guy.....
I'm really glad to know I'm not the only person who appreciates the beauty and sexiness of this gorgeous boy!!!!
I don't care how long the search takes I will find pics of him!!!!
pity on the show, they show Gibby shirtless every time he's on....but nothing from Nathan- even Spencer is shirtless....
Nathan is hot! I'd like to see more of him as well.
Just to be evil: Nathan does have A shirtless pic, but it looks like he has maybe 14 at the time. Also, he has been shirtless on the show, but it was done in such a way that you couldn't see anything but his arms...FWIW...Quote:
Originally Posted by aagold76
RG
I think the problem is that he doesn't seem to have the popularity that say, the Sprouse Brothers or Taylor Lautner have. There are zillions of images of them available - and a reasonable amount since they became 18.Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
As Nathan only turned 18 in November last year, and he doesn't seem to have the fan base, I think it'll take a while for pics to surface - which is a shame, because I'd choose him over the Sprouse Brothers or Taylor Lautner any day!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by aagold76
Tell me about it. I bet Nathan has a better body than both of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by RobinGoodfellow
I've seen that shirtless pic of Nathan. He definitely wasn't older than 14, but it was still better than Gibby's body, and better than Spencer in relation to the age of both those guys. I'm sure Nathan's body looks WAY hotter now.
As for him being shirtless on the show, were you talking about when they were in the "hot tub"? I think that was one of the episodes when he was younger.
Well that's because the Sprouse Brothers were the stars of their own show, and ONLY because they're twins. Otherwise, there would be nothing special about them. Taylor Lautner landed a role in the Twilight series, which every girl in America loves to death even though it totally sucks. Taylor has the better body but I still think Nathan is cuter. The Sprouse twins, they're bodies are pretty average. Overall I would definitely choose Nathan over all three of them!!Quote:
Originally Posted by quasar
Oh, I thought maybe you had some talent and made them. Guess I was wrong. Your talent is pushing the envelope on child porn. He is obviously under 18 in that drawn pic. Maybe you should check out NAMBLA instead of JUB.Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
I think the hot tub pics were just shoulders/up...you see his shoulders in the giant coffee cup....was hopeful when he was in the shower and fell/Carly had to get him out- but they slapped a robe on him before he entered the room......not really interested in the earlier pics- he's been working out a lot lately- would lvoe to see that buff bod now.....
You know how sometimes a TV show gives a minor character/co-star an episode that's mostly centered around them. iCarly needs to do that for Freddie/Nathan. His character has grown into a very significant part of the show and deserves more attention, especially since he's gorgeous as fuck!! I think Freddie is hotter than a couple of the crushes Carly has had on the show. Especially the guy in the "iStart a Fan War' episode. We all know that eventually Carly and Freddie are gonna fall madly in love with each other so just make it happen already!!
Well it's not my fault you misinterpreted what I posted. I said I FOUND a sketch of Nathan, so clearly READING isn't your talent.Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedragon4
I don't know where you got the idea that it's obvious he's under 18 since it looks just like he does now. Besides I don't recall this forum having any specific rules on drawings/sketches which means it's at the moderator's discretion. In case you missed it, sice you seem to miss quite a few things around here, the moderator said it was okay.
I know what you mean. When I watched that episode and Carly went to get him out of the shower, so many dirty thoughts ran through my mind. I know she didn't see anything because of those goggles, but I'm sure she managed to get a nice little feel when she helped him put his robe on. Lucky girl!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by aagold76
Nathan has about 170,000 followers on twitter. The issue is that he isn't into all the self promoting that others are. He tends to keep himself out of the spotlight as much as possible, promoting the show and other Nick shows/films as his contract requires.Quote:
Originally Posted by quasar
He's a far cry from Zac Efron, who parades himself out like a cheap whore trying to turn a trick.
Actually maybe you are right. I am 38 and just see guys this young as kids. I wouldn't even date a man in his 20's. I like the 5 year rule. You are probably a young guy yourself. I am guessing you are under 22. Maybe you have the 5 year rule also.Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
It's in the Code of Conduct rule 2. A drawing is still an 'image'.Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1491
The jury is out on whether it's okay or not.Quote:
In case you missed it, sice you seem to miss quite a few things around here, the moderator said it was okay.
And that's a bad thing because? ;) :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie Boy
Not everybody likes cheap whores... with their lice, and fleas, and God only knows how many diseases..... But hey, whoever is into that, whatever. It just isn't my thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by quasar
He's a good looking guy. I'm not that far off him in age...